Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Abu-Qulbain v Same; Kashmiri v Same

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Justice Laws
Judgment Date01 March 2005
Neutral Citation[2005] EWCA Civ 105
Docket NumberCase Nos: C4/2003/2789, C2/2004/0258 & C4/2004/1555
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date01 March 2005
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
227 cases
  • HB v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 14 December 2006
    ...under the European Convention. 13 The force of that principle was restated in classic terms by this court in Huang v Home Secretary [2006] QB 1, where Laws LJ said that the balance between private right and public interest inherent in article 8 could normally be taken to have been struck b......
  • SA (Ambit of s 85(5) of 2002 act) Pakistan
    • United Kingdom
    • Asylum and Immigration Tribunal
    • 25 January 2006
    ...Home Department; Abu-Qulbain v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Kashmiri v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUNK [2005] EWCA Civ 105; [2005] Imm AR 240; [2005] INLR 247 LS (Post-Decision evidenceDirectionAppealability) Gambia [2005] UKAIT 00085; [2005] Imm AR 310; [2006] ......
  • AJ (Liberia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 December 2006
    ...demands an outcome in the claimant's favour: see Razgar v SSHD [2004] UKHL 27; 2 AC 368 at paragraphs 17–20 and Huang v SSHD [2005] EWCA Civ 105 at paragraphs 59–60. 19 The only reported cases in which Article 3 or Article 8 has been held by either the ECHR or an English appellate court to ......
  • R (AA (Afghanistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 1 March 2006
    ...a child too sick to travel. Such an applicant might have a "truly exceptional" Article 8 claim (so as to satisfy the requirements of Huang [2006] QB 1) which would be violated by an enforced removal to another EU Member State under Dublin I, let alone removal to his country of origin. Mr Jo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT