Hunt-Wesson Inc.'s Trade Mark Applications
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1996 |
| Year | 1996 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
35 cases
-
Diesel S.P.A. v Controller of Patents
...as of the date it was filed and would, if successful, provide protection only from that date. Hunt-Wesson Inc.'s Trade Mark Application [1996] R.P.C. 233 not followed. 7. That as the 1963 Act contemplated that the parties to a contested trade mark application would have the opportunity to m......
-
Miguel Torres SA v Cantine Mezzacorona SCARL
...the court had a general discretion, and, on a trade mark appeal, would take into account the sort of factors indicated in SWISS MISS TM [1996] RPC 233. 38 I agree with that conclusion, although the decision of Lawrence Collins J predates the decision in Bessant. Nonetheless, the conclusion ......
-
Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Energy, Commerce and Tourism, Republic of Cyprus v John & Pascalis Ltd
...the exercise of the discretion, which are to be applied in the light of the overriding objective; iii) it is useful to have regard to the Hunt-Wesson factors; iv) relevant factors will vary, depending on the circumstances of each case. Neither the Ladd v Marshall factors nor the Hunt-Wesson......
-
EI Dupont de Nemours & Company v ST Dupont
... ... , arises from an application by EIDP to register the mark DU PONT in class 25, the clothing class. That application ... would be contrary to sections 9 and 10 of the Trade Marks Act 1938 because the trade mark DU PONT was "neither ... The judge allowed both applications and refused an adjournment requested by EIDP to enable them ... 100 In Hunt-Wesson Inc.'s Trade Mark Application [1996] 1 R.P.C. 233 , ... ...
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Intellectual Property Law
...1 SLR 1287. 128 [1954] 1 WLR 1489. 129 Yitai (Shanghai) Plastic Co, Ltd v Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Co [2021] SGHC 198 at [30]. 130 [1996] RPC 233. 131 Yitai (Shanghai) Plastic Co, Ltd v Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Co [2021] SGHC 198 at [34]. 132 [2019] 2 SLR 341. 133 Yitai (Shanghai) Plast......
-
Civil Procedure
...87A r 13(2). The Court of Appeal stated (Martek at [16]) that the factors listed by Laddie J in Hunt-Wesson Inc“s Trade Mark Application [1996] RPC 233 were useful (but not exhaustive) guidelines in patent proceedings. These factors included the factors set out in Ladd v Marshall (above, pa......