Hunt-Wesson Inc.'s Trade Mark Applications

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1996
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
62 cases
  • Fromageries Bel SA v J Sainsbury Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 12 December 2019
    ... ... PROPERTY LIST (ChD) ON APPEAL FROM THE TRADE MARKS REGISTRY Royal Courts of Justice, Rolls ... ’) in which he found that UK registered trade mark no. 2 060 882 (‘the Trade Mark’) is invalidly ... evidence in trade mark appeals, in particular Hunt-Wesson Inc's Trade Mark Application [1996] RPC 234 , Club ... ...
  • Omega Engineering Inc. v Omega SA
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 28 May 2010
    ...objective is furthered; and (iii) in the particular context of trade mark appeals, the additional factors set out in Hunt-Wesson Inc's Trade Mark Application [1996] RPC 233 may be 98 The first Ladd v Marshall requirement is that the new evidence could not have been obtained with reasonable......
  • EI Dupont de Nemours & Company v ST Dupont
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 October 2003
    ... ... , arises from an application by EIDP to register the mark DU PONT in class 25, the clothing class. That application ... would be contrary to sections 9 and 10 of the Trade Marks Act 1938 because the trade mark DU PONT was "neither ... The judge allowed both applications and refused an adjournment requested by EIDP to enable them ... 100 In Hunt-Wesson Inc.'s Trade Mark Application [1996] 1 R.P.C. 233 , ... ...
  • Ministere de l'Agriculture de la Foret v Bernard Matthews Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Intellectual Property Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2021, December 2021
    • 1 December 2021
    ...1 SLR 1287. 128 [1954] 1 WLR 1489. 129 Yitai (Shanghai) Plastic Co, Ltd v Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Co [2021] SGHC 198 at [30]. 130 [1996] RPC 233. 131 Yitai (Shanghai) Plastic Co, Ltd v Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Co [2021] SGHC 198 at [34]. 132 [2019] 2 SLR 341. 133 Yitai (Shanghai) Plast......
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2010, December 2010
    • 1 December 2010
    ...87A r 13(2). The Court of Appeal stated (Martek at [16]) that the factors listed by Laddie J in Hunt-Wesson Inc“s Trade Mark Application [1996] RPC 233 were useful (but not exhaustive) guidelines in patent proceedings. These factors included the factors set out in Ladd v Marshall (above, pa......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT