Hussey v Horne-Payne

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
67 cases
  • Rudhra Minerals Pte Ltd v MRI Trading Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 25 September 2013
    ... ... Ltd v Laing O'Rourke Midlands Ltd [2008] EWHC 1016 (TCC) (refd) Hillas & Co Ltd v Arcos Ltd (1932) 147 LT 503 (folld) Hussey v Horne-Payne (1879) 4 App Cas 311 (distd) Jewellery Industries (S) Pte Ltd v Sintat Rent-a-Car Pte Ltd [1993] 1 SLR (R) 744 ; [1993] 2 ... ...
  • Global Asset Capital, Inc. and Another v Aabar Block S.A.R.L. and Another (3) Robert Tchenguiz (Third Defendant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 1 February 2017
    ...whether a contract has been made during the course of negotiations the court will look at the whole course of those negotiations – see Hussey v Horne-Payne (1878) 4 App Cas 311. 29 As Lord Cairns observed in that case at 316: "…You must not at one particular time draw a line and say, "We wi......
  • Rotam Agrochemical Company Ltd v Gat Microencapsulation GmbH (Formerly Gat Microencapsulation AG)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 25 October 2018 consider communications subsequent to the date of the alleged contract. In the words of Earl Cairns LC in Hussey v Horne-Payne (1879) 4 App Cas 311: “You must not at one particular time draw a line and say, ‘We will look at the letters up to this point and find in them a contract or not,......
  • Howard Smith & Company Ltd v Varawa
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Contract formation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...the following terms and conditions”), coupled with the signature of the contracting party or its agent. 176 172 Hussey v Horne-Payne (1879) 4 App Cas 311 at 323, per Lord Selborne. 173 See, eg, Sunyards Engineering Ltd v Newell Curtain Wall & Engineering Co Ltd [2012] HKCFI 1943. See also E......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT