Huyton S.A. v Peter Cremer G.m.b.H. & Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1999 |
| Date | 1999 |
| Year | 1999 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
-
Oliver Dean Morley t/a Morley Estates v The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
...v. International Transport Workers' Federation [1991] 2 AC 152, 165; as explained by Mance J (as he then was) in Huyton v. Cremer [1999] 1 Lloyds Rep 620, 636, setting as a minimum a “but for” test whereby the illegitimate pressure must have “actually caused” the making of, or the terms of......
-
Times Travel (UK) Ltd v Pakistan International Airlines Corporation
...in a number of judgments: McHugh JA's judgment in Crescendo, as quoted by Lord Goff in Dimskal Shipping, Mance J's judgment in Huyton SA v Peter Cremer GmbH & Co [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep 620 at 637–8 and the Privy Council's judgment in Borelli v Ting. He referred also to Cooke J's judgment in ......
-
C v D1 and Others
... ... Its ultimate parent company is an oil and gas major. D1 and D3 are affiliated ... 100 In Monde Petroleum SA" v WesternZagros Ltd [2015] 1 Lloyd's Rep 330 (\xE2\x80" ... ...
-
Terna Bahrain Holding Company Wll v Ali Marzook Ali Bin Kamil Al Shamsi and Others
... ... 66 ; Zermalt Holdings SA v NU-Life Upholstery Repairs Limited [1985] 2 EGLR 14 ; inmetals Germany GmbH v Ferco Steel Ltd [1999] 1 All ER (Comm) 315 ; Westland ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
THE USE AND ABUSE OF ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTIONS
...Com Cas 116. 20Malmesbury Railway Co v Budd(1876) 2 Ch D 113; Beddow v Beddow(1878) 9 Ch D 89. 21Huyton SA v Peter Cremer GmbH & Co[1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep 620 at 623 and 642. 22Compagnie Européenne de Céréales SA v Tradax Export SA[1986] 2 Lloyd's Rep 301 at 305–306. 23Claxton Engineering Serv......
-
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v. C.G. Berbatis Holdings Pty. Ltd.; curbing unconscionability: Berbatis in the High Court of Australia.
...also to be finding its way into modern English decisions on the duress doctrine: see, eg, Huyton SA v Peter Cremer GmbH & Co [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep 620, 637 (Mance (120) See, eg, Equiticorp Finance Ltd (in liq) v Bank of New Zealand (1993) 32 NSWLR 50, 107. In that case, Kirby P saw wisdo......
-
VITIATING FACTORS IN CONTRACT LAW — SOME KEY CONCEPTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
...which problem has now been settled by the case law: see generally Phang, supra n 1, at 34—35, and the literature cited therein. 178 [1999] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 620. 179 See the Australian Privy Council decision of Barton v Armstrong[1976] AC 104. 180 Supra n 178 at 636. 181 See the English Court o......
-
EQUITY AND OPPORTUNISM IN THE LAW OF CONTRACT:
...p 324. 102 Mindy Chen-Wishart, Contract Law (Oxford University Press, 5th Ed, 2015) at p 337. 103Huyton SA v Peter Cremer GmbH & Co[1999] 1 Lloyds Rep 620 at 636. 104Universe Tankships, Inc of Monrovia v International Transport Workers Federation[1983] 1 AC 366 at 400. 105Huyton SA v Peter ......
Request a trial to view additional results