Hyams v Stuart King

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1908
Year1908
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
51 cases
  • Hill v William Hill (Park Lane) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 29 July 1949
    ...by the first limb, would have left the whole matter in this state of uncertainty. 32 In his powerful dissenting judgment in Hyams v. Stuart King [1908] 2 K.B. 696, Fletcher Moulton L.J. at page 723, thus deals with the problem: "Finally it was suggested before us that there was a contract, ......
  • Jeffrey & Company v Bamford
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Genforsikrings Aktieselskabet (Skandinavia Reinsurance Company of Copenhagen) v Da Costa
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 28 October 1910
    ...of Home Marine Insurance Company v. Smith (78 L. T. Rep. 734; (1898) 2 Q. B. 351), Mathew, J. (1898) 1 Q B. 829Hyams v. Stuart KingELR 99 L. T. Rep. 424 (1908) 2 K. B. 696 Home Marine Insurance Company v. SmithELR 78 L. T. Rep. 734 (1898) 2 Q. B. 351 Stamp Act 1891 (54 & 55 Vict. c. 39), ss......
  • Insofex Sdn Bhd v Labasama Group Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Unspecified court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free