Imageview Management Ltd v Jack

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Justice Jacob,Lord Justice Dyson,Lord Justice Mummery
Judgment Date13 February 2009
Neutral Citation[2009] EWCA Civ 63
Docket NumberCase No: A2/2008/1408
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date13 February 2009
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
33 cases
  • Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Andrew Joseph Ruhan
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 23 February 2022
    ...is required to account to reflect his skill and effort in selling the Hyde Park Hotels. 259 As the Court of Appeal made clear in Imageview Management Ltd v Jack [2009] EWCA Civ 63, the power to order such an allowance in favour of a defaulting fiduciary is “to be exercised sparingly” ([60]......
  • Jeremy Hosking v Marathon Asset Management LLP
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 5 October 2016
    ...benefit of it, he must pay the commission". 14 The forfeiture principle was reaffirmed and explained by the Court of Appeal in Imageview Management Ltd v Jack [2009] EWCA Civ 63, [2009] Bus LR 1034. In that case, a footballer's agent had made a secret side deal with a club when negotiating......
  • Crocs Europe BV v Craig Lee anderson and Another trading as Spectrum Agencies (A Partnership)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 October 2012
    ...39 Ch D 339 at 362–3 (even an isolated case of a breach of confidence and good faith may justify dismissal of an employee); Imageview Management Ltd v. Jack [2009] EWCA Civ 63 (breach of fiduciary duty by taking a secret commission so that agent had to account for commission and forfeit rig......
  • HPOR Servicos De Consultoria Ltda v Dryships Inc.
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 13 December 2018
    ...for but against Item, that Item is entitled to claim part of any salary paid or still payable as damages’. 91 The second case is Imageview Management Ltd v. Jack [2009] EWCA Civ 63; [2009] 2 All ER 666. This was referred to in argument before the Tribunal but not relied on by them. An agen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Let The Agent Beware
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 29 September 2009
    ...is collateral to his fiduciary duty to his principal? This was the argument put forward by the defence in Imageview Management v Jack [2009] EWCA Civ 63. The of Appeal's decision highlights the stringency of an agent's duties. The Facts The facts are simple. Mr Jack, Trinidad's internationa......
1 books & journal articles
  • RECONFIGURING THE NO CONFLICT RULE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...for the safety of mankind requires that no agent shall be able to put his principal to the danger of such an in inquiry as that.” 164 [2009] 1 BCLC 724 (CA) (emphasising the importance of maintaining high standards of conduct of agents and applying the full rigour of the law to instances of......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT