Imperial Group Ltd v Philip Morris & Company Ltd (NERIT)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1982 |
| Date | 1982 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
51 cases
-
Swanfu Trading Pte Ltd v Beyer Electrical Enterprise Pte Ltd
... ... and Sim Li Beng trading as Swanfu Trading Company, a firm. The mark is represented as follows:From ... , then the use is not bona fide: see Imperial Group Ltd v Philip Morris & Co Ltd (supra) which ... of application to register the trade mark `Nerit` there was any bona fide intention to use the ... ...
-
Marks and Spencer Plc v Interflora Inc. (A Company Incorporated Under the laws of the State of Michigan, USA) and Another
... ... public who regard Swiss chocolate as the name for a group of products of repute will be confused into thinking that ... 61 Imperial Group plc v Philip Morris Ltd [1984] RPC 293 dealt a ... ...
-
Beyer Electrical Enterprise Pte Ltd v Swanfu Trading Pte Ltd
...use, authorities note, should be judged by ordinary commercial standards. Brightman LJ in Imperial Group Ltd v Philip Morris & Co Ltd [1982] FSR 72 at p 91 observed: `Bona fide` has in s 26 [our s 40] the meaning of `genuine`, rather than the meaning of `honest` which it bears in s 8 [equiv......
- Liwayway Marketing Corporation v Oishi Group Public Company Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW IN SINGAPORE: A GENERAL OVERVIEW1
...of a person as a registered user of a trade mark. See below under “Registered Users.” 123 See Imperial Group v. Phillip Morris[1982] F.S.R. 72. See also section 40 of the Trade Marks Act as amended by section 24 of the Trade Marks (Amendment) Act 1991, which contains provisions dealing with......
-
Intellectual Property Law
...the register if it was not used or if there was no intention to use it, citing the UK cases of Imperial Group Ltd v Philip Morris & Co Ltd[1982] FSR 72, Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd (supra para 16.46) and PHILOSOPHY DI ALBERTA FERRETTI Trade Mark[2003] RPC 15 in support. 16.50......
-
Intellectual Property Law
...it should be revoked if it is not used or if there is no intention to use it (see [34], citing Imperial Group Ltd v Philip Morris & Co Ltd[1982] FSR 72; Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd (para 16.33 supra); and ‘PHILOSOPHY DI ALBERTA FERRETTI’ Trade Mark[2003] RPC 15). 16.37 The la......