Indermaur v Dames

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Common Pleas
Date1865
Year1865

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
120 cases
  • See Toh Siew Kee v Ho Ah Lam Ferrocement (Pte) Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 24 April 2013
    ... ... ) Gorman v Williams [1985] 2 NSWLR 662 (refd) Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd [1964] AC 465 (refd) Indermaur v Dames (1866) LR 1 CP 274 (not folld) Industrial Commercial Bank v Tan Swa Eng [1995] 2 SLR (R) 385 ; [1995] 2 SLR 716 (refd) ... ...
  • Bates v Parker
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 27 February 1953
    ...very attractively for the Plaintiff when he said that the decision in favour of the Defendant was tantamount to saying that the rule in Indermaur v. Dames did not apply to window cleaners. The answer to that is that if the cleaner had been injured by some defect in the premises whichhad not......
  • Maclenan v Segar
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Francis v. Cockrell ( 1870 ) L. R. 5 Q. B. 501 followed and applied; Indermaur v. Dames ( 1866 ) L. R. 1 C. P. 274 ; ( 1867 ) 2 C. P. 311 distinguished ... FURTHER CONSIDERATION of an action tried by McCardie J ... ...
  • Davie v New Merton Board Mills Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 28 January 1959
    ...general matters of principle which seemed to him to be involved. Then he said that the case fell within the general rule enunciated in Indermaur v. Dames, 1 C.P. 274: 2 C.P. 311, There follows the passage chiefly relied on by the Appellant: "The duty of the invitor towards the invitee is, i......
  • Get Started for Free