Indexes

DOI10.1350/1740-5572-18.4.365
Publication Date01 October 2014
SubjectIndexes
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF 365
SUBJECT INDEX
SUBJECT INDEX
abuse, childsexual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .359
access tojustice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80,275
accountants
legal adviceprivilege . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65–77
admissibility of evidence
Aggregated Probabilities Principle (APP)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291–309
hearsayevidence . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271–272,363
implied statements . . . . . . . . . . . 181–187
sexual historyevidence . . . . . . . . . . . 146–150
similar factevidence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272
advocacy
in refugeedeterminations . . . . . . . . 326–328
affirmations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .195–196
Aggregated Probabilities Principle (APP)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291–309
alternative disputeresolution. . . . . . . . . . . . . 360
Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197,279
APP (Aggregated Probabilities Principle)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291–309
appeals, criminal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .360
asylum
refugee determinations. . . . . . . . . . . 310–339
audio evidence
use ofpolice transcripts. . . . . . . . . . . 205–229
Australia
access tojustice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275
child sexualabuse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359
closed courthearings . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233–238
criminal appeals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360
disputeresolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360
DNA evidence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .194
domesticviolence . . . . . . . . . . . . 275–276, 360
homicide victims. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194–195
jurors andsocial media . . . . . . . . . . . . .78–79
jury directions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
jury selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
oaths andaff irmations. . . . . . . . . . . .195–196
protection of people with a disability
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359–360
refugee determinations. . . . . . . . . . . 310–339
right tocross-examine . . . . . . . . . . . . 246–248
use ofpolice transcripts. . . . . . . . . . . 205–229
belief evidence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340–352
broadcasting oftrials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .267–270
Canada
access tojustice. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
closed courthearings . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238–240
digital technology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79–80
electronic surveillance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .80
impliedhearsay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .181–187
judicial decision-making. . . . . . . . . . 139–180
right tocross-examine . . . . . . . . . . . . 248–250
vulnerable witnesses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
case management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278
charges, court. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362
child homicide
fact determination. . . . . . . . . . 154–157,168–170
child sexualabuse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .359
China
confessions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196
illegallyobtained evidence . . . . . . . . . . . . 361
closed courthearings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230–259
Codes ofPractice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
compensation for wrongful conviction 197,279
condom evidence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362
confession evidence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .196
corroboration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18–26
confidentiality see legal advice privilege
contempt of court
New Zealand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .361
UnitedKingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .362
contextual priming. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205–229
convictions, safetyof. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28–40
corroboration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1–27
warning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37–38
sexual offencetrials . . . . . . . . . . . . .41–64
court charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362
covert recordings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205–229
credibility ofwitness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28–40
refugee determinations. . . . . . . . . . . 310–339
see also reliability of witness
criminal appeals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .360
criminal casemanagement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278
criminal evidence,disclosure of . . . . . . . . . . . 197
criminal investigation
Codes ofPractice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197,280
criminal proceduralrights . . . . . . . . . . . 276–277
cross-examination
right tocross-examine . . . . . . . . . . . . 230–259
death penalty
presumptionof innocence and . . . . 260–266
decision-making
refugee determinations. . . . . . . . . . . 310–339
theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139–180
defendants’ rights
corroboration warningand . . . . . . . . . .53–55
digital technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .79–80
diminished responsibility. . . . . . . . . . . . 355–358
directions
lawreform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT