India (Union of) v McDonnell Douglas Corporation
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1993 |
| Date | 1993 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
Enercon Gmbh and Another v Enercon (India) Ltd
...the language of Cooke J.) so as to place the "seat" of the arbitration in India. A similar issue was considered by Saville J in Union v of India v McDonnell [1993] 2 Lloyd's Rep 48 which, of course, pre-dates the English 1996 Act. The arbitration agreement in that case provided as follows: ......
-
Halpern v Halpern (No 1)
...Ltd v Miller [1970] A.C. 583; Naviera Maritima Peruana S.A. v Compania Internacional de Seguros de Peru [1988] I L loyd's Rep 1116; Union of India v McDonnell [1993] 2 Lloyd's Rep 48. In Naviera Maritima Peruana the Court of Appeal overruled a first instance decision that an arbitration was......
- Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi as v OOO Insurance Company Chubb
-
Shagang South-Asia (Hong Kong) Trading Company Ltd v Daewoo Logistics
...is the reason why choice of place generally carries with it an implied choice of governing procedure. As Saville J explained in Union of India v McDonnell [1993] 2 Lloyd's Rep 48 at p50: "If the parties do not make an express choice of procedural law to govern their arbitration, then the co......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Where Do You Sit If There Is No Seat? The Relevance Of The 'Procedural Law' In International Arbitration
...Peruana SA v Compania Internacional de Seguros del Peru [1988] 1 Lloyd's Rep 116 and Union of India v McDonnell Douglas Corp [1993] 2 LLoyd's Rep 48. 5. Section 2 of the Arbitration Act 1996 provides: "(1) The provisions of this Part apply where the seat of the arbitration is in England and......
-
The Law Governing The Arbitration Agreement In LCIA Arbitrations: Where You Stand Depends On Where You Sit
...this new default rule can be expected to reduce the number of disputes about which law governs the arbitration agreement. Footnotes [1993] 2 Lloyd's Rep 48 2 [2007] EWCA Civ 1282 3 2001] 1 All E. R. (Comm) 530 4 Sulamerica Cia Nacional De Seguros SA & Others v Enesa Engenharia SA & ......
3 books & journal articles
-
LEX ARBITRI, PROCEDURAL LAW AND THE SEAT OF ARBITRATION
...de Seguros del Peru [1988] 1 Lloyd's Rep 116. 50[1993] 1 AC 334 at 375A–358A. See also Union of India v McDonnell Douglas Corp[1993] 2 Lloyd's Rep 48 at 50. 51Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara364 F 3d 291 (5th Cir, 2004) at [32]. 52 Section 3 of the Ar......
-
DEVELOPMENTS IN ARBITRATION LAWS
...which was not the law of the seat of arbitration. Naviera Amazonica Peruana SA, supra and Union of India v McDonnell Douglas Corpn[1993] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 48 were cited to the Court, but these cases involved rather more ambiguous provisions regarding jurisdiction and curial law and were disting......
-
Expert evidence: Recommendations for future research
...of Good Practice for Forensic Practitioners;12 National Justice Cia Naviera SA v Prudential Assurance Co Ltd, The Ikarian Reefer [1993] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 48 at 81-82.13 Lord Woolf (1996) Access to Justice Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System in England and Wales 177.14 1995......