Inglis v Buttery
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1877 |
| Year | 1877 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
46 cases
-
Wells v Minister of Housing and Local Government
...at words that have been deleted. They are struck out and are to be treated as if they were not in the document at all. See A& J. Inglis v. John Buttery & Co. (1878) 3 Appeal Cases at page 552 by Lord Hatherley, Lord Chancellor, and Sessoon & Son v. The International Banking Corporation, 192......
-
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd and another
...(1877) 5 R 58, 69-70. When that case came before this House Lord Blackburn said that they set out exactly what he himself thought: (1878) 3 App Cas 552, 577. As Lord Gifford explained, the very purpose of a formal contract is to put an end to the disputes which would inevitably arise if the......
-
City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd v Mudd
... ... Caffin v. Aldridge [ 1895 ] 2 Q.B. 648 ; 12 T.L.R. 27 distinguished; Inglis v. Buttery ( 1878 ) 3 App.Cas. 552 applied ... (2) That the nature of the property, however, was a matter to be taken into consideration, ... ...
-
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd and another
...(1877) 5 R 58, 69-70. When that case came before this House Lord Blackburn said that they set out exactly what he himself thought: (1878) 3 App Cas 552, 577. As Lord Gifford explained, the very purpose of a formal contract is to put an end to the disputes which would inevitably arise if the......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
Contract formation
...BC (4th edition, volume 2) 274 at 277–278, per Bigham J; Seaton Brick and Tile Co Ltd v Mitchell (1900) 2 F 550. 492 Inglis v Buttery (1878) 3 App Cas 552. Even if the contractor could not have ascertained the true volume or nature of work he would be required to perform, he may be bound to......
-
Contract Law
...99 Pte Ltd [2018] SGHC 52 at [30]. 76 See para 12.67 above. 77 [2013] 4 SLR 193. 78 [2015] 3 SLR 732. 79 See para 12.46 above. 80 (1873) 3 App Cas 552. 81 Xia Zhengyan v Geng Changqing [2015] 3 SLR 732 at [73]. 82 See para 12.67 above. 83 [2016] 2 SLR 1083. 84 Hewlett-Packard Singapore (Sal......
-
Contract Law
...prior negotiations would fall foul of the criterion of a clear and obvious context. It raised the example of Inglis v John Buttery & Co(1878) 3 App Cas 552 (‘Inglis’), in which there was a contract for works on a ship for a fixed sum of £17,250. In the course of negotiations between the par......
-
THE CASE FOR DEPARTING FROM THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE AGAINST PRIOR NEGOTIATIONS IN THE INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACTS IN SINGAPORE
...14 SAcLJ 365 at 366. See also Rajapakse Pathurange Don Jayasena v The Queen[1970] 2 WLR 448; [1970] AC 618. 86 See para 33 below. 87(1878) 3 App Cas 552. This case was recently given new attention in David McLauchlan, “Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd: Commonsense Principles of Interpre......
Request a trial to view additional results