Inglis v Inglis and Baxter

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1967
Year1967
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Hearn v Hearn
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Matthew Miles Hulse v Creslyn Ann Hulse
    • Belize
    • Supreme Court (Belize)
    • 15 July 2021
    ...this suit cannot be taken as an admission of adultery contrary to the submissions of the Respondent. (see Inglis v Inglis and Baxter 1968 P. 639) the Respondent still has to prove her case beyond a reasonable 11 The incidents set out by the Respondent do not disclose affectionate behaviour ......
  • Gladys Maud Hore (Petitioner) v Dennis Frederick Hore (Respondent)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 5 December 1969
    ...he was seeking forgiveness, and he relied on a recent decision of the learned President in the case of Inglis v. Inglis and Baxter (1968) Probate, 639, and in particular on a passage at page 653. There the learned President disagreed with what had been put in the 9th Edition of Hayden on Di......
  • McCurdy v. McCurdy, (1981) 35 N.B.R.(2d) 451 (TD)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • 10 July 1981
    ...interest - See paragraphs 21 to 24. Cases Noticed: Sergeant v. Sergeant (1974), 7 N.S.R.(2d) 670, appld. [para. 16]. Inglis v. Inglis, [1967] 2 All E.R. 71, appld. [para. Strachan v. Strachan (1969), 72 W.W.R.(N.S.) 383, appld. [para. 17]. Blunt v. Blunt, [1943] A.C. 517, appld. [para. 21].......
5 books & journal articles
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Ground for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Third Edition
    • 2 September 2008
    ...so as to bar a divorce, if the reconciliation ul-172 Mackrell v. Mackrell , [1948] 2 All E.R. 858 (Eng. C.A.). 173 Inglis v. Inglis , [1968] P. 639; Watkins v. Watkins (1980), 14 R.F.L. (2d) 97 (Nf‌ld. T.D.). 174 Ibid . 175 Henderson v. Henderson , [1944] A.C. 49 (H.L.). See also Julien D. ......
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 August 2020
    ...CA); Leaderhouse v Leaderhouse (1971), 4 RFL 174 (Sask QB). 181 Mackrell v Mackrell, [1948] 2 All ER 858 (Eng CA). 182 Inglis v Inglis, [1968] P 639; Watkins v Watkins (1980), 14 RFL (2d) 97 (Nfld 183 Inglis v Inglis, [1968] P 639; Watkins v Watkins (1980), 14 RFL (2d) 97 (Nfld TD). 184 Hen......
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Fifth Edition
    • 29 August 2013
    ...2 All ER 858 (Eng CA); Leaderhouse v Leaderhouse (1971), 4 RFL 174 (Sask QB). 197 Mackrell v Mackrell , ibid . 198 Inglis v Inglis , [1968] P 639; Watkins v Watkins (1980), 14 RFL (2d) 97 (Nfld TD). 199 Ibid . 200 Henderson v Henderson , [1944] AC 49 (HL). See also Julien D Payne, “The Conc......
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Sixth Edition
    • 29 August 2015
    ...CA); Leaderhouse v Leaderhouse (1971), 4 RFL 174 (Sask QB). 197 Mackrell v Mackrell , [1948] 2 All ER 858 (Eng CA). 198 Inglis v Inglis , [1968] P 639; Watkins v Watkins (1980), 14 RFL (2d) 97 (Nfld TD). 199 Inglis v Inglis , [1968] P 639; Watkins v Watkins (1980), 14 RFL (2d) 97 (Nfld TD).......
  • Get Started for Free