Interbulk Ltd v Ponte dei Sospiri Shipping Company (Standard Ardour)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1988
Date1988
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Borgship Tankers Inc. v Product Transport Corporation Ltd (The Casco) [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 28 February 2005
    ...goods" within Article III rule 6 of the Hague-Visby Rules? 22 Guidance comes from Goulandris v Goldman supra; The Standard Ardour [1988] 2 Lloyd's Rep 159 (charterers made claims based on the owners' failure to provide a vessel properly equipped to measure cargo quantities, which resulted i......
  • Bulk & Metal Transport (UK) Ltd v VOC Bulk Ultra Handmaz Poll LLC
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 20 February 2009
    ... ... full members of the LMAA and engaged in Shipping, one to be appointed by each of the parties, with ... Mr Coburn relied upon The “Standard Ardour” [1998] 2 Lloyd's Rep 159. Mr ... ...
  • Finagra (UK) Ltd v OT Africa Line Ltd [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 24 June 1998
    ... ... in the judgment: Adamastos Shipping Co Ltd v Anglo-Saxon Petroleum Co Ltd (“The ... Interbulk Ltd v Ponte dei Sospiri Shipping Co (“The ard Ardour”)UNK [1988] 2 Ll Rep 159 ... ' time bars, where otherwise a standard six-year limitation period would apply, the bill ... ...
  • (1) Finmoon Ltd (2) OOO "Megafruit" v (1) Baltic Reefers Management Ltd (2) Howell Trading Sa and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 17 April 2012
    ...such appointment thereunder. In that context, Mr Howard QC relied in particular on the decision of Saville J in The Standard Ardour [1988] 2 Lloyd's Rep 159 in particular at p162: "In my judgment the charterers' counterclaim was not referred to arbitration. It was accepted by [counsel]—cor......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT