International Tea Stores Company v Hobbs
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1903 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Re Ellenborough Park; Re Davies, deceased; Powell v Maddison
...experienced and learned in real property law, on two occasions, namely, in 1903 in the case of ( International Tea Stores v. Hobbs 1903, 2 Chancery, page 165) and in 1905 in ( Attorney-General v. Antrobus 1905, 2 Chancery, page. 188) used language appearing to treat as axiomatic the propo......
-
Graham v Philcox
...the relevant way with the land. 14 In support of his submission, Mr. Reid referred us to a number of authorities, among them International Tea Stores Co. v. Hobbs (1903) 2 Chancery 165, where at page 172 Mr. Justice Farwell said: "The real truth is that you do not consider the question of t......
- Green v Ashco Horticulturist Ltd
-
Wall v Collins and another
...As to the first, the key to the operation of the section is enjoyment in fact, not title. As Farwell J said in the leading case, International Tea Stores v Hobbs [1903] 2 Ch 165: “The real truth is that you do not consider the question of title to use, but the question of fact of user; you ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Creation of Easements and Profits
...[2004] 1 P & CR 18 at [59]. 17 Green v Ashco Horticulturalist Ltd [1966] 1 WLR 889 at 897C–898B; International Tea Stores Co v Hobbs [1903] 2 Ch 165. 18 Sovmots Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [1979] AC 144 at 169, per Lord Wilberforce. 19 Watts v Kelson (1870) 6 Ch......