International Tea Stores Company v Hobbs

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1903
Year1903
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
18 cases
  • Re Ellenborough Park; Re Davies, deceased; Powell v Maddison
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 15 Novembre 1955
    ...experienced and learned in real property law, on two occasions, namely, in 1903 in the case of ( International Tea Stores v. Hobbs 1903, 2 Chancery, page 165) and in 1905 in ( Attorney-General v. Antrobus 1905, 2 Chancery, page. 188) used language appearing to treat as axiomatic the propo......
  • Graham v Philcox
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 Aprile 1984
    ...the relevant way with the land. 14 In support of his submission, Mr. Reid referred us to a number of authorities, among them International Tea Stores Co. v. Hobbs (1903) 2 Chancery 165, where at page 172 Mr. Justice Farwell said: "The real truth is that you do not consider the question of t......
  • Green v Ashco Horticulturist Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Regency Villas Title Ltd and Others v Diamond Resorts (Europe) Ltd and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 14 Novembre 2018
    ...sides of the same debate may be found Keith v 20th Century Club Ltd (1904) 73 LJ Ch 545 (in favour); International Tea Stores Co v Hobbs [1903] 2 Ch 165 at 172, and Attorney General v Antrobus [1905] 2 Ch 188 at 198 (Farwell J in both cases, 48 I consider that In re Ellenborough Park shou......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Preliminary Sections
    • 30 Agosto 2016
    ...v Louisville Investments (Uxbridge) Ltd [1986] Ch 513, [1986] 2 WLR 581, [1986] 1 All ER 321, CA 279 International Tea Stores Co v Hobbs [1903] 2 Ch 165 11 Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 WLR 896, [1998] 1 All ER 98, [1998] 1 BCLC 531, HL 275 Iron......
  • Creation of Easements and Profits
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part I. Easements and profits à prendre
    • 30 Agosto 2016
    ...[2004] 1 P & CR 18 at [59]. 17 Green v Ashco Horticulturalist Ltd [1966] 1 WLR 889 at 897C–898B; International Tea Stores Co v Hobbs [1903] 2 Ch 165. 18 Sovmots Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [1979] AC 144 at 169, per Lord Wilberforce. 19 Watts v Kelson (1870) 6 Ch......