Investigation committee.

PositionInstitute update - Cases of Graham Brickstock Australian Communications and Media Authority

The investigation committee found a prima facie case for Graham Brickstock ACMA to answer concerning allegations that he had: failed to inform clients of additional costs when they arose; delayed billing for work he had carried out in 2004 until 2007; intended to charge for meeting to discuss a resolution; failed to inform clients of the internal complaints procedure until the final stage; and informed his clients' new accountant that he would not be forwarding their accounting records, tax returns and statutory accounts.

Pursuant to members' regulation 6.3 (iii) and council regulation 16, the investigation committee invited Brickstock to consent to the imposition of a reprimand and the payment of costs in the sum of 250 [pounds sterling] by way of "consent order", without further proceedings. Brickstock agreed. The committee recorded a finding upholding the complaint, issuing an order for the imposition of a reprimand and payment of the costs.

The investigation committee found a prima facie case for Anthony Mead FCMA to answer in relation to an order made by the ICAEW.

With Mead's agreement, the committee of...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT