Jackson, Qui Tam, Company v Gisling
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1795 |
| Date | 01 January 1795 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 93 E.R. 1105
COURTS OF CHANCERY, KING'S BENCH, COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER
davis vers. miller et Ux'. Words not actionable. These words, "You cheated the lawyer of his linen, and stood bawd to your daughter, to make it up with him, you cheat every body, you cheated me of a sheet, you cheated Mr. Saunders, and I will let him know it:" were held not actionable, without a colloquium of the plaintiff's trade or profession (1). (1) Vide 1 Com. Dig. tit. Action for Defamation (F. 7), 268. 1106 MICHAELMAS TEEM, 16 GEO. 2 J STRANGE, 1170. [1170] michaelmas term, 16 georgii 2, eegis. in B. R. Sir William Lee, Knt., Chief Justice. Sir William Chappie, Knt., Martin Wright, Eaq., Thomas Denison, Esq., Justices...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Turner v Davies
...Keb. 426, 491, Hutchins v. Thomas. 2 Lev. 141, S. C. Cro. Eliz. 261, Reg. v. Harris. Hob. 128, Pie v. Cake. Moor. 864, S. C. 2 Hawk. 275. 2 Str. 1169, Jackson v. G-isling. 3 Burr. 1423, Combe v. Pitt, did not apply; for in them priority of judgment was not the question, but priority of suit......
-
Henry Farran Darley, Plaintiff in Error; v The Queen At The Relation of Robert Kinahan
...v. GoudgeENR 2 Str. 1213. Rex v. BinghamENR 2 East. 308. Rex v. HighmoreENR 1 Dow. & Ry. 438; S. C. 5 B. & Al. 771. Rex v. FranchardENR 2 Str. 1169. Rex v. HaltonENR 1 Str. 621. Rex v. Hall 1 B. & Cr. 123. DaubeneyENR 2 Str. 1196. Rex v. SheppardENR 4 T. R. 381. Rex v. The Duke of BedfordEN......