Jacob v Down

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1900
Date1900
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Wells v Baypart Ltd
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 10 Mayo 1991
    ...defendant at the highest they do not comply with the provisions of subsection 16(1) of the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act. 39 Jacob v. Down [1900] 2 Ch. 156 was a case which dealt with the validity of a notice under s. 14(1) of the Conveyancing Act 1881 (Eng.) where there had been ......
  • Wells v Baypart Ltd
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 10 Mayo 1991
    ...defendant at the highest they do not comply with the provisions of subsection 16(1) of the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act. 40 Jacob v. Down [1900] 2 Ch. 156 was a case which dealt with the validity of a notice under s. 14(1) of the Conveyancing Act 1881 (Eng.) where there had been ......
  • Payne v Haine
    • United Kingdom
    • Exchequer
    • 10 Febrero 1847
    ...1884, 26 Ch. D. 167; Lister v. Lane, [1893} 2 Q. B. 212. Referred to, In re Gaskell's Settled Estates, [1894] 1 Ch. 485; Jacob v. Down, [1900] 2 Ch. 156; In re London Corporation; London Corporation v. Great Western and Metropolitan Railways, [1910] 2 Ch. 317. payne v. haine. Feb. 10, 1847.......
  • Midleton v Wallis
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • Invalid date
    ...L.C., and Holmes and Cherry, L.JJ. (1) I. R. 5 C. L. 418. (2) 22 T. L. R. 54. (1) [1894] 2 I. R. 579. (2) 43 I. L. T. R. 140. (3) [1900] 2 Ch. 156. (4) 2 H. & N. (5) I. R. 5 C. L. 418. (6) 22 T L. R. 54. (1) I R. 5 C. L. 418. (2) 22 T. L. R. 54. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT