James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 2007 |
| Neutral Citation | [2007] UKEAT 0475_06_2102 |
| Year | 2007 |
| Date | 2007 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
101 cases
-
Ms Janette Parsons v Birmingham City Council and Birmingham Children’s Trust: 1304537/2017 and others
...as an integral part of its organisation. As regards the Claimant, we consider it was the latter. In James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd. [2007] ICR 1006, EAT, Mr Justice Elias had identified that there may be cases where the integration test was not appropriate and where, instead, the ‘dominant pu......
-
Ms J Varnish v British Cycling Federation T/a British Cycling and UK Sports Council T/a UK Sport: 2404219/2017
...Church of Scotland [2006] 2 AC 28 • Cotswold Developments Construction Ltd v Williams [2006] IRLR 181 EAT • James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd [2007] ICR 1006 • Firthglow Ltd (t/a Protectacoat) v Szilagyi [2009] ICR 835 • Weight Watchers (UK) Ltd & Ord v HMRC [2012] STC 265 • Enfield Technical Se......
-
Bates van Winkelhof v Clyde & Company LLP and another (Pubic Concern at Work intervening)
...integral part of the principal's operations, will in most cases demonstrate on which side of the line a given person falls". 35 In James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd [2007] ICR 1006, Elias J agreed that this would "often assist in providing the answer" but the difficult cases were those where th......
-
Pimlico Plumbers and Another v Smith
...instead the purpose had been that the company's Sunday newspapers should be efficiently distributed around Sheffield. But in James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd [2007] ICR 1006 Elias J, as president of the appeal tribunal, convincingly suggested at paras 65 to 67 that an inquiry into the dominant ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Defining the employment relationship in the platform economy - independent contractors, workers or employees?
...to the Second Appellant. ii) If the Respondents were ‘workers’, what periods constituted their ‘working time’ 47 43 [2007] UKEAT 0475; [2007] ICR 1006, para. 59. 44 (n 38) [71]. 45 [2011] UKSC 41; [2011] ICR 1157. 46 (n 38) [120]. 47 The Supreme Court, Uber BV and others (Appellants) v Asla......