JEB Fasteners Ltd v Marks, Bloom & Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1983 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
74 cases
-
Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG v Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
...was in part thecause of what he did, the mere fact of his also making a mistake himself could make no difference…”29 157 In JEB Fasteners v Marks Bloom & Co (a firm) [1983] 1 All ER 583, Donaldson LJ observed: “… In real life decisions are made on the basis of a complex of assumptions of fa......
- Connaught Income Fund
-
Marme Inversiones 2007 SL v Natwest Markets Plc
...56 LJ Ch 321, in which Handley takes Stirling J to have decided that ‘but for’ causation does not need to be proved, and JEB Fasteners Ltd v Marks Bloom & Co [1983] 1 All ER 583, as to which Handley says this: “Properly understood the decision of the Court of Appeal in JEB Fasteners Ltd v ......
-
BSkyB Ltd and Another v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd and Another
...need not be the sole cause of the claimant acting as he did, provided that it substantially contributed to deceive him: see JEB Fasteners Ltd v Marks Bloom & Co [1983] 1 All ER 583 per Stephenson LJ at 589b and Donaldson LJ at 588c/d. 326 In Avon Insurance Plc Rix J said this at paragraph 1......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Auditors' Liability for BCCI
...(1991), The Liability of Professional Advisers: Caparo and After', Journal of Business Law, January, pp. 36-49. 6 [1981] 3 All ER 289, [1983] 1 All ER 583. 7 [1990 Ch 313. 8 [1989 QB 653. 9 [1990] 2 AC 605. The decision in Caparo has been subjected to extensive analysis; see, for example, W......
-
Tort Law
...was the sole inducement. Citing the cases of Edgington v Fitzmaurice(1885) 29 ChD 459, and JEB Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co[1983] 1 All ER 583, it held (at 411, para 20) that “the most that can be said on behalf of the appellants was that both Lee and Yin relied partly on their own knowled......