Jelen and Katz

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1990
Year1990
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
23 cases
  • R v Roberts (Stephen)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Re Proulx
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • R v Allan (Richard Roy)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 20 August 2004
    ... ... introduction of a person into the presence of the suspect in order to obtain admissions" (pages 226 and 231), relying, in part, upon R v Jelen and Katz (1990) 90 Cr App R 456 ... As Mr Davies points out, in Roberts the trial judge made a number of what the Court of Appeal described as ... ...
  • R v Smurthwaite ; R v Gill
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 11 August 1993
    ...case must be determined on its own facts. (See Samuel 87 Cr App R 232 at page 245, Parris 89 Cr App R 68 at page 72 and Jelen and Katz 90 Cr App R 456 at page 465, and other cases cited in Archbold at paragraph 15.364. 20 We now turn to consider the application of these principles to the fa......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Police Cells and Unwanted Bugs
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 67-1, February 2003
    • 1 February 2003
    ...of this article. However,50 R vBailey and Smith (1993) 97 Cr App R 365.51 [19971 Crim LR 222;andsee RvJelen and Katz (1990) 90 Cr App R 456. See alsothepre-PACE cases: RvShaukatAli.The Times (19February1991); RvAliandHussein [19661 I QB 688; RvStewart (1970) 54 Cr App R 210.52 The bugging w......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT