Jennings v Rice

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Justice Aldous,Lord Justice Mantell,Lord Justice Robert Walker
Judgment Date22 February 2002
Neutral Citation[2002] EWCA Civ 159
Docket NumberCase No: A3/2001/1013
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date22 February 2002
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
188 cases
10 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Inheritance Act Claims 4th ed
    • 14 August 2023
    ...CA 84, 118, 124, 231 Jennings (Deceased), Re [1994] Ch 286, [1994] 3 WLR 67, [1994] 1 FLR 536, CA 139, 156, 158, 178 Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2002] WTLR 367, [2003] 1 P & CR 8, [2002] NPC 28 195, 196, 197, 200 Jessop v Jessop [1992] FLR 591, [1992] 2 FCR 253, [1992] Fam Law 328......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Probate Disputes - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 August 2022
    ...Jarrom v Sellars [2007] EWHC 1366 (Ch), [2007] WTLR 1219, [2007] All ER (D) 202 (Apr) 223, 227–228 Table of Cases xix Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 FCR 501, [2002] WTLR 367, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 162 Jessop v Jessop [1992] 1 FLR 591, [1992] 1 FCR 253, [1992] Fam Law 328, CA 174 ......
  • CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS AND DISCRETION IN AUSTRALIA: TAKING STOCK.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 44 No. 3, April 2021
    • 1 April 2021
    ...LJ); Davies vDavies [2015] EWHC 1384 (Ch), [55] (Jarman J); Thompson v Foy [2009] EWHC 1076 (Ch), [98] (Lewison J). In Jennings vRice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, Robert Walker LJ suggested in obiter that courts could take into account '(to a limited degree) the other claims (legal or moral) on the......
  • Lifetime Agreements and Gifts
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Probate Disputes - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 August 2022
    ...Thus the essence of the doctrine of proprietary estoppel is to do what is necessary to avoid an unconscionable result: Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159; [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [56]. vii) In deciding how to satisfy any equity the court must weigh the detriment suffered by the claimant in re......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT