Jill Robbie, Private Water Rights

Date01 September 2016
Author
Published date01 September 2016
Pages408-409
DOI10.3366/elr.2016.0377

Against a background of unacceptably high carbon emissions and rising seas, the search for alternative energy sources includes the development of hydropower and tidal-power. This means an inevitably increasing interest in legal questions relating to water in the near future. Enter Dr Jill Robbie's excellent new monograph, which helps to clarify a number of interesting questions in the law of water, an area which until now has been much under-researched (the only other monograph having been published in 1907).

Dr Robbie's work, a revised version of her 2012 PhD thesis, is divided into three main sections: the first discusses the division of things in Scots Law, the second the rights of ownership of land beneath bodies of water, and the third – and substantially largest – details the history and nature of common interest as it applies to running water in Scotland.

In the first section, Robbie remarks that it is odd that Scots legal literature has hitherto shown little interest in the division of things. This seems a fair point; with our system of property law heavily influenced by Roman law and the civil codes of our European neighbours, it seems surprising that there has been so little discussion of this issue beyond the simple division of corporeal, incorporeal, moveable, and heritable property. Indeed, it may be this lack of focus on key definitions which has led many scholars over the centuries to confuse and intertwine the issues of common interest and common property when discussing water rights. It is important, Robbie argues, to distinguish between common property, whereby all owners of a thing have rights over that thing, with common interest, where owners can prevent their neighbours from undertaking certain actions which will prevent the enjoyment of their property – for example, by restricting one from polluting or blocking water which runs through one's land.

Robbie concludes in this section that, since rivers are constantly moving bodies of water, they are incapable of private ownership, due to their continuously changing nature. This classification as res communes, rather than res publicum – or property owned by the state – is important for later discussion. Robbie's analysis is useful and will hopefully inspire further research on the division of things, which could prove helpful in the field of human body parts and perhaps even air, as pollution makes this resource more valuable.

The second section provides detailed discussion on the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT