John Stokes port Action de dett v Arthur Porter Executor de Testament de
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
103 cases
-
Fowler v Keegan Quarries Ltd
... ... 14 John Keegan, the managing director of the Respondent ... surprised that you have failed to take action and to have the illegal activities of Mr. Keegan ... ...
-
Roome v Edwards
...Schedule 10, para. 12). Thus it could be made on the respondents. 22 The critical statutory provisions for this purpose are section 25( 1) and (11) and Schedule 10, para. 12(1) of the 1965 Act�which I have already reproduced. 23 I have found greater difficulty on this point than I believe......
-
Zhu v Treasurer of the State of New South Wales
...with contract. Bergin J, sitting in the Equity Division of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, conducted a 20 day trial between 30 July and 11 September 2001. On 23 November 2001, she gave judgment for the plaintiff against SOCOG in the sum of $4,234,319. That figure included $95,000 in a......
-
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Nystrom
...means a person who is not an Australian citizen.’ 105 See, for example, ss 4(b) and (c), and ss 6–9 in respect of ‘immigrant’ and ss 4(a) and 11 in respect of ‘alien’ in the 1983 106 See the Explanatory Memorandum to the Migration Laws Amendment Bill (No 2) 1992 at 9. 107 Section 7 of the 1......
Get Started for Free