Johnson v Moreton

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Year1977
Date1977

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
32 cases
  • Kandasami; Mohamed Mustafa
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Gisborne v Burton
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 July 1988
    ...to grant a tenancy to the defendant, and what actually happened was that Mr. Christopherson granted such a tenancy. 24 In Johnson v. Moreton Lord Salmon commented at pages 52H-53A in relation to the particular clause, clause 27, there in question by which the tenant had covenanted not to se......
  • Featherstone v Staples
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 March 1986
    ... ... that the court should prefer the second construction as leading to a "sensible and just result complying with the statutory objective": (see Johnson v. Moreton [1980] A.C. 37 at page 50 per Lord Salmon) instead of adopting a construction which would invalidate a counter-notice given in such ... ...
  • City Investment Sdn Bhd v Koperasi Serbaguna Cuepacs Tanggungan Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free