Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Joint Stock Company Aeroflot Russian Airlines v Berezovsky and Others

Cited authorities 13 Cited in 4 Precedent Map Related
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2012] EWHC 1610 (Ch)
Date2012
Year2012
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Joint Stock Company 'Aeroflot-Russian Airlines' v Berezovsky and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 2 Julio 2013
    ...& 1720 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION MR JUSTICE FLOYD [2012] EWHC 1610 (Ch) Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Francis Tregar QC & Alex Pelling (instructed by Streathers Solicitors LLP) for the Appell......
  • Golden Ocean Group Ltd v Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi Tbk Ltd and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 16 Mayo 2013
    ...such a stay. 53 A helpful recent summary of relevant authority is to be found in the judgment of Floyd J in JSC Aeroflot Russian Airlines v Berezovsky [2013] 1 Lloyd's Rep 345: "67. As Lightman J made clear in Albon v Naza Trading Sdn Bhd (No 3) [2007] 2 Lloyd's Rep 1, section 9(1) requires......
  • P. Elliot & Company Ltd v FCC Elliot Construction Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 28 Agosto 2012
    ...pursuant to Article 8 (1) of the Model Law. 41 The plaintiff refers toJoint Stock Company Aeroflot Russian Airlines v. Berezovsky [2012] EWHC 1610, which suggests (at para. 5 in the judgment) that if a stay is to be granted under s. 9 of the (UK) Arbitration Act. 1996, the court must be sat......
  • PJSC Aeroflot — Russian Airlines v Michael Thomas Leeds, Nicholas Stewart Wood, and Kevin John Hellard (as Trustees of the estate of Boris Berezovsky)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 6 Julio 2018
    ...Aeroflot and E M Finance was effective to give the courts of Switzerland exclusive jurisdiction in relation to the matters of dispute: [2012] EWHC 1610 (Ch). Floyd J dismissed the challenge to jurisdiction by three other Forus Defendants. On appeal by the three unsuccessful Forus Defendants......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT