Jones v Bates

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1938
Year1938
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
34 cases
  • Walsh v Sligo County Council
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 20 Diciembre 2010
    ...1 Ch. 440; [1928] All E.R. 308. Jaques v. Secretary of State for the Environment[1995] J.P.L. 1031; [1994] N.C. 79. Jones v. Bates [1938] 2 All E.R. 237; (1938) L.G.R. 227. The King (Hewson) v. Wicklow County Council [1908] 2 I.R. 101. The King v. Lambe (1791) 2 Leach 552; 168 E.R. 379. M'K......
  • Edward Walsh and Another v County Council for County of Sligo
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 11 Noviembre 2013
    ...1024; Holloway v Egham Urban District Council (1908) 72 JP 433; Coats v Herefordshire County Council [1909] 2 Ch 579; Jones v Bates [1938] 2 All ER 237; Director of Public Prosecutions v Jones [1999] 2 AC 240; In re Ward of Court [1996] 2 IR 79; Bord na gCon v Murphy [1970] IR 301; The Kin......
  • Thomas Condron v Galway Holding Company Ltd and Danmar Construction Ltd and Stephen Treacy and Maureen Treacy
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 30 Julio 2021
    ...made clear in Walsh v. Sligo County Council, having analysed the jurisprudence including the decisions of Scott L.J. and Slesser L.J. in Jones v. Bates [1938] 2 All E.R. 237, although evidence of long user is evidence from which dedication might be inferred, it will not compel a court to f......
  • Mills and Another v Silver and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 6 Julio 1990
    ...the law talks of something being done as of right it means that the person doing it believes himself to be exercising a public right: Jones v. Bates [1938] 2 All ER 237. So far as I can see, no witness was asked whether in picking up coal he believed himself to be exercising a right or was......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Public Rights of Way
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Planning Law. A Practitioner's Handbook Contents
    • 30 Agosto 2019
    ...into question’, the landowner must challenge it by some means sufficient to bring it home to the public that he is 61 Jones v Bates [1938] 2 All ER 237 per Scott LJ: ‘The word “interruption” must be given its proper import in its grammatical context. A mere absence of continuity in the de f......
  • Creation of Highways
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part III. Public rights of way
    • 30 Agosto 2016
    ...of Highway Law and Practice (Sweet & Maxwell, looseleaf) ( Highway Law and Practice ) at 2-065.1. 44 See e.g. Jones v Bates [1938] 2 All ER 237, per Scott LJ, ‘The word “interruption” must be given its proper import in its grammatical context. A mere absence of continuity in the de facto us......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Public Rights of Way: The Essential Law Contents
    • 30 Agosto 2019
    ...v Egham UDC (1908) 72 JP 433, 6 LGR 929, ChD 21 Jaques v Secretary of State for the Environment [1995] JPEL 1031, QBD 26 Jones v Bates [1938] 2 All ER 237, 36 LGR 227, 102 JP 291, CA 34 Jones v Welsh Assembly Government [2008] EWHC 3515 (Admin) 142 Kay v Commissioner of Police of the Metrop......
  • Creation of Rights of Way
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Public Rights of Way: The Essential Law Contents
    • 30 Agosto 2019
    ...in the de facto user will not stop time running, there must be interference with the enjoyment of a right of passage, Jones v Bates [1938] 2 All ER 237, 246. Thirdly, ‘interruption’ means ‘interruption of fact’. However, the circumstances of and the intention with which the barring of the w......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT