Jones v Bates

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1938
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
34 cases
  • Walsh v Sligo County Council
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 20 December 2010
    ...1 Ch. 440; [1928] All E.R. 308. Jaques v. Secretary of State for the Environment[1995] J.P.L. 1031; [1994] N.C. 79. Jones v. Bates [1938] 2 All E.R. 237; (1938) L.G.R. 227. The King (Hewson) v. Wicklow County Council [1908] 2 I.R. 101. The King v. Lambe (1791) 2 Leach 552; 168 E.R. 379. M'K......
  • Edward Walsh and Another v County Council for County of Sligo
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 11 November 2013
    ...1024; Holloway v Egham Urban District Council (1908) 72 JP 433; Coats v Herefordshire County Council [1909] 2 Ch 579; Jones v Bates [1938] 2 All ER 237; Director of Public Prosecutions v Jones [1999] 2 AC 240; In re Ward of Court [1996] 2 IR 79; Bord na gCon v Murphy [1970] IR 301; The Kin......
  • Thomas Condron v Galway Holding Company Ltd and Danmar Construction Ltd and Stephen Treacy and Maureen Treacy
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 30 July 2021
    ...made clear in Walsh v. Sligo County Council, having analysed the jurisprudence including the decisions of Scott L.J. and Slesser L.J. in Jones v. Bates [1938] 2 All E.R. 237, although evidence of long user is evidence from which dedication might be inferred, it will not compel a court to f......
  • Mills and Another v Silver and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 6 July 1990
    ...the law talks of something being done as of right it means that the person doing it believes himself to be exercising a public right: Jones v. Bates [1938] 2 All ER 237. So far as I can see, no witness was asked whether in picking up coal he believed himself to be exercising a right or was......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Creation of Rights of Way
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Public Rights of Way: The Essential Law Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...in the de facto user will not stop time running, there must be interference with the enjoyment of a right of passage, Jones v Bates [1938] 2 All ER 237, 246. Thirdly, ‘interruption’ means ‘interruption of fact’. However, the circumstances of and the intention with which the barring of the w......
  • Public Rights of Way
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Planning Law. A Practitioner's Handbook Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...into question’, the landowner must challenge it by some means sufficient to bring it home to the public that he is 61 Jones v Bates [1938] 2 All ER 237 per Scott LJ: ‘The word “interruption” must be given its proper import in its grammatical context. A mere absence of continuity in the de f......
  • Creation of Highways
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part III. Public rights of way
    • 30 August 2016
    ...of Highway Law and Practice (Sweet & Maxwell, looseleaf) ( Highway Law and Practice ) at 2-065.1. 44 See e.g. Jones v Bates [1938] 2 All ER 237, per Scott LJ, ‘The word “interruption” must be given its proper import in its grammatical context. A mere absence of continuity in the de facto us......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Planning Law. A Practitioner's Handbook Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...540, 589 Johnston v Secretary of State for the Environment (1974) 28 P & CR 424, 73 LGR 22, (1974) 118 SJ 717, QBD 331 Jones v Bates [1938] 2 All ER 237, CA 534 Jones v Mordue [2015] EWCA Civ 1243, [2016] 1 WLR 2682, [2016] 1 P & CR 12, [2016] JPL 476 424, 444 Jones v Secretary of State for......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT