Jones v Great Central Railway Company
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1910 |
Year | 1910 |
Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 cases
- Public Prosecutor v Dato' Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim (No. 3)
-
General Accident Assurance Co. et al. v. Chrusz et al., (1999) 124 O.A.C. 356 (CA)
...refd to. [para. 104]. Wheeler v. Le Marchant (1881), 17 Ch. D. 675 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 104]. Jones v. Great Central Railway Co., [1910] A.C. 4 (H.L.), refd to. [para. Goodman and Carr v. Minister of National Revenue, [1968] 2 O.R. 814 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 104]. Alcan-Colony Contracti......
-
Dadourian Group International Ltd Inc. and Others v Simms and Others (No. 1)
...in confidence between solicitors and their clients. He also referred me to the decision of the House of Lords in Jones v Great Central Railway Company [1910] AC 4 where information provided by an employee to his trade union to enable it to decide whether to grant legal assistance with a cl......
-
Waugh v British Railways Board
...... day of the accident a brief report was made to the railway inspectorate soon afterwards a joint internal report ... 674 ; 11 A.L.R. 577 . . Jones v. Great Central Railway Co. [ 1910 ] A.C. 4 , ... on a form headed: ‘For the information of the company's solicitors only,’ which is a very important heading to ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...[2004] HCA 57 ...........................138Jones v DPP [1962] AC 635 ............................. 24Jones v Great Central Railway Company[1910] AC 4, HL ...........................................20 1Jones (c.o.b. MacPuffin Motel) v INAInsurance Co. of Canada (1983) 59 NSR(2d) 365 (TD) ........
-
Legal Advice Privilege and the Corporate Client
...case.99 Anderson v Bank of British Columbia (1876) LR 2 Ch D 644 at 649–50 per Sir George Jessel MR;Jones v Great Central Railway Company [1910] AC 4 at 5, HL; Re Highgrade Traders Ltd [1984]BCLC 151 at 164; Price Waterhouse v BCCI (Luxembourg) SA [1992] BCLC 583 at 589.100 Australian Rugby......
-
NEW TWISTS IN LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE: COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF LITIGATION AND BETWEEN THE LAWYER AND CLIENT
...Columbia(1876) 2 Ch D 644, at 656 (James LJ), 658—659 (Mellish LJ); Kyshe v Holt[1888] WN 128 (Smith J). Cf Jones v Great Central Railway[1910] AC 4; Young v Holloway(1887) 12 PD 167 and Cave J’s view in Kyshe v Holt[1888] WN 128. For a recent affirmation of the distinction between the priv......