Jones v Great Central Railway Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1910
Year1910
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
30 cases
  • Public Prosecutor v Dato' Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim (No. 3)
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1999
  • General Accident Assurance Co. et al. v. Chrusz et al., (1999) 124 O.A.C. 356 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 14 September 1999
    ...refd to. [para. 104]. Wheeler v. Le Marchant (1881), 17 Ch. D. 675 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 104]. Jones v. Great Central Railway Co., [1910] A.C. 4 (H.L.), refd to. [para. Goodman and Carr v. Minister of National Revenue, [1968] 2 O.R. 814 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 104]. Alcan-Colony Contracti......
  • Dadourian Group International Ltd Inc. and Others v Simms and Others (No. 1)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 25 July 2008
    ...in confidence between solicitors and their clients. He also referred me to the decision of the House of Lords in Jones v Great Central Railway Company [1910] AC 4 where information provided by an employee to his trade union to enable it to decide whether to grant legal assistance with a cl......
  • Waugh v British Railways Board
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • Invalid date
    ...... day of the accident a brief report was made to the railway inspectorate soon afterwards a joint internal report ... 674 ; 11 A.L.R. 577 . . Jones v. Great Central Railway Co. [ 1910 ] A.C. 4 , ... on a form headed: ‘For the information of the company's solicitors only,’ which is a very important heading to ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 9-4, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...[2004] HCA 57 ...........................138Jones v DPP [1962] AC 635 ............................. 24Jones v Great Central Railway Company[1910] AC 4, HL ...........................................20 1Jones (c.o.b. MacPuffin Motel) v INAInsurance Co. of Canada (1983) 59 NSR(2d) 365 (TD) ........
  • Legal Advice Privilege and the Corporate Client
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 9-3, July 2005
    • 1 July 2005
    ...case.99 Anderson v Bank of British Columbia (1876) LR 2 Ch D 644 at 649–50 per Sir George Jessel MR;Jones v Great Central Railway Company [1910] AC 4 at 5, HL; Re Highgrade Traders Ltd [1984]BCLC 151 at 164; Price Waterhouse v BCCI (Luxembourg) SA [1992] BCLC 583 at 589.100 Australian Rugby......
  • NEW TWISTS IN LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE: COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF LITIGATION AND BETWEEN THE LAWYER AND CLIENT
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...Columbia(1876) 2 Ch D 644, at 656 (James LJ), 658—659 (Mellish LJ); Kyshe v Holt[1888] WN 128 (Smith J). Cf Jones v Great Central Railway[1910] AC 4; Young v Holloway(1887) 12 PD 167 and Cave J’s view in Kyshe v Holt[1888] WN 128. For a recent affirmation of the distinction between the priv......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT