Jones v Lipman
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Judgment Date | 1962 |
| Year | 1962 |
| Date | 1962 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
150 cases
- Yukong Line Ltd of Korea v Rendsburg Investments Corporation of Liberia (The Rialto) (Mareva Proceedings)
-
Dave Persad v Anirudh Singh (Trinidad and Tobago)
...Mr Beharrylal suggested that the facts of this case were comparable with those in Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne [1933] Ch 935 and Jones v Lipman [1962] 1 WLR 832, whose facts are respectively set out by Lord Sumption in Prest at paras 29 and 30. The Board considers that those cases are rea......
- Lim Sung Huak and Others v Sykt Pemaju Tanah Tikam Batu Sdn Bhd
- JH Rayner (Mincing Lane) Ltd and Others v Manilal & Sons (M) Sdn Bhd and Another
Get Started for Free
27 books & journal articles
-
Chapter 5. The Subservient Subsidiary Situation
...judgment, however, was the meaning of that term explained. 3 Cf. Gilford Motor Co. Ltd. v. Horne [1933] 1 Ch. 935 (C.A.); Jones v. Lipman [1962] 1 All E.R. 442. The latter judgment is referred to with approval in Adams v. Cape Industries plc BCLC 479 (C.A.) at p. 518. 4 [1990] BCLC 479 at p......
-
Chapter 2: The Salomon principle and the corporate veil
...(IRC v Sansome [1921] 2 KB 492). 2.2.2.1: Fraud situations The court will lift the veil to prevent fraud or sharp practice. In Jones v Lipman [1962] 1 All ER 442, a vendor of land sought to evade a decree of specific performance of a contract for the sale of a piece of land by conveying the......
-
Chapter 2: Groups and their use
...key features of company law can be disregarded at the request of the owners, not creditors or third parties. In 1962, in the case of Jones v Lipman 85 it was claimed that the company was not in breach of the land contract and could not be obligated to transfer the land by way of an order fo......
-
James Hardie and the Development of Parent Company Liability: New Zealand as a Forum for Transnational Human Rights Litigation?
...Watson, Lynne Taylor (eds) Corporate Law in New Zealand (Thomson Reuters, Wellington, New Zealand, 2018) at 4.6–4.7; and Jones v Lipman [1962] 1 WLR 832 at 836 per Russell J. 10 Watson, above n 9, at 4.6.3. 11 At 4.6.4. 80 [Vol 28, 2021] or all shares in its subsidiaries. 12 However, in New......
Get Started for Free
