Jones v Lipman

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Judgment Date1962
Year1962
Date1962

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
152 cases
1 firm's commentaries
  • Personal Liability Risk For Passive Directors
    • Ireland
    • Mondaq Ireland
    • 20 September 2023
    ...have done so in very limited circumstances, including when a company has been formed for fraudulent or illegal purposes (Jones v Lipman [1962] 1 WLR 832), where a company is being used to perpetrate an injustice against minority shareholders (Re Bungle Press Limited [1961] Ch270) and when t......
8 books & journal articles
  • James Hardie and the Development of Parent Company Liability: New Zealand as a Forum for Transnational Human Rights Litigation?
    • New Zealand
    • Canterbury Law Review No. 28-2021, January 2021
    • 1 January 2021
    ...Watson, Lynne Taylor (eds) Corporate Law in New Zealand (Thomson Reuters, Wellington, New Zealand, 2018) at 4.6–4.7; and Jones v Lipman [1962] 1 WLR 832 at 836 per Russell J. 10 Watson, above n 9, at 4.6.3. 11 At 4.6.4. 80 [Vol 28, 2021] or all shares in its subsidiaries. 12 However, in New......
  • REVISITING THE ALTER EGO EXCEPTION IN CORPORATE VEIL PIERCING
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...years” from 1966 to 1989; and “back to basics” from 1989 onwards. The classical veil-lifting years involved cases such as Jones v Lipman[1962] 1 WLR 832 and Gilford v Horne[1933] Ch 935 where the courts were slow to intervene. During the interventionist years, the courts were more ready to ......
  • VEIL PEEKING: THE CORPORATION AS A NEXUS FOR REGULATION.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 169 No. 3, February 2021
    • 1 February 2021
    ...271(c) (2005). (304) For the U.K. law precedents, see, for example, Gilford Motor Co., Ltd. v. Home [1933] Ch 935 and/ones v. Lipman [1962] 1 All ER 442. (305) Jones, [1962] 1 All ER at 442-44. (306) Id. at 445. (307) See, e.g., T.J.S.R, Apelacao Civel No. 0217635-30.2011.8.26.0000, Relator......
  • THE NEW ERA OF CORPORATE VEIL-PIERCING
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...96. 12Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd[2013] 3 WLR 1 at [28]. 13Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd[2013] 3 WLR 1 at [35]. 14[1933] Ch 935. 15[1962] 1 WLR 832. 16Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd[2013] 3 WLR 1 at [29]–[30]. 17Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd[2013] 3 WLR 1 at [29]. 18Prest v Petrodel Re......
  • Get Started for Free