Jones v Pritchard
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1908 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
51 cases
- Bephia v Sahijaram A Thani
-
Rudd v Rea
...2 Ch. 1. (7) 11 Rep. 52a. (8) 6 M. & W. 174. (9) 7 Ex. 77. (10) 43 C. D., at p. 481. (11) [1907] A. C. 476. (12) 30 L. R. I. 425. (1) [1908] 1 Ch. 630, at pp. 635, 637. (2) 3 Q. B. D. 195. (3) [1898] 1 I. R. 272. (4) 4 Q. B. D. 412. (5) L. R. 7 Ch. 699. (6) 11 Rep. 51b. (1) 43 Ch. D. 470. (......
-
Regency Villas Title Ltd and Others v Diamond Resorts (Europe) Ltd and Another
...Miller v Emcer. Perhaps the most telling example is the grant of a right of way over a route which includes a substantial bridge: see Jones v Pritchard [1908] 1 Ch 630 at 637. This may require significant regular maintenance, and (in connection with a freehold easement) the large expense o......
-
Moncrieff v Jamieson and Others
...grant and the question is what ancillary rights are necessary for the convenient and comfortable use and enjoyment of the servitude. In Jones v Pritchard [1908] 1 Ch 630, 638 Parker J said that the grant of an easement is prima facie also the grant of such ancillary rights as are reasonabl......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Easements are simple, right? But do you understand their scope?
...227 per Richards J, as cited in Easements and Restrictive Covenants in Australia, Bradbrook and Neave (2nd edition). 2Jones v Pritchard [1908] 1 Ch 630 3(2007) 233 CLR 528 4Ex parte Purcell (1982) 47 LGRA 433 5Hemmes Hermitage Pty Ltd v Abdurahman (1991) 22 NSWLR 343 (CA); Zenere v Leate (1......
-
Q&A: Trespass
...to turn, which appears to be the position from your question, then there will be no express right to turn. References: Jones v Pritchard [1908] 1 Ch 630 The general rule is that a right of way may only be used for gaining access to the land identified as the dominant tenement in the grant. ......
4 books & journal articles
-
Easements and Nuisance
...(Dec). 34 Farm Law , 1 February 1997. 35 See also Bradburn v Lindsay [1983] 2 All ER 408, discussed at para 7.4. 36 Jones v Pritchard [1908] 1 Ch 630. 78 Positive Covenants and Freehold Land trust of the party wall with mutual duties of repair for each half and then s 38 would come automati......
-
Table of Cases
...[1978] 3 All ER 37, HL 236 Jones v Price [1965] 2 QB 618, [1965] 3 WLR 296, [1965] 2 All ER 625, CA 71, 72, 73, 170 Jones v Pritchard [1908] 1 Ch 630, 77 LJ Ch 405, [1908–10] All ER Rep 80, ChD 77, 80 Kennard v Cory Bros & Co Ltd [1922] 2 Ch 1, 91 LJ Ch 452, 127 LT 137, CA 195–197 Kilgour v......
-
Particular Easements and Examples of Analogous Remedies of Relevance to Development
...at the time of the original acquisition of the adjoining land. 12 Newcomen v Coulson (1877) 5 Ch D 133 at 143–144; Jones v Pritchard [1908] 1 Ch 630 at 638; Mills v Silver [1991] Fam 271 at 286H–287A. 13 Jones v Pritchard [1908] 1 Ch 630 at 638. 14 Transco Plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borou......
-
Easements
...owner could not be obliged to pay for supply of water to his own land so that it could pass to the dominant land. 24 Jones v Pritchard [1908] 1 Ch 630 at 637. 25 Gale on Easements at 1-91. 26 Bond v Nottingham Corp [1940] Ch 429 at 438; Goodhart v Hyett (1883) 25 Ch D 182. 27 Reilly v Booth......