Joss v Joss

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1943
Date1943
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Kennon v Spry
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 3 Diciembre 2008
    ...Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418 at 438; [1950] HCA 35. 147 (1950) 81 CLR 418 . 148 Brooks v Brooks [1996] AC 375 at 392 . 149 Joss v Joss [1943] P 18 at 20 per Henn Collins 150 In the Marriage of Knight (1987) 90 FLR 313 at 318 per Nygh J. 151 The decision of the primary judge was not reported.......
  • Melanie Ann Clayton v Mark Arnold Clayton
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 23 Marzo 2016
    ...will be a nuptial settlement if a particular marriage is a fact a settlor takes into account in framing the settlement: see Joss v Joss [1943] P 18 at 20, cited with approval in In the Marriage of Knight (1987) 90 FLR 313 at 316. See further Paul Brereton “The High Court and family law: Two......
  • Parrington v Parrington
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • Lort-Williams v Lort-Williams
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Common Law, Equity, and American Public Administration
    • United States
    • Sage American Review of Public Administration, The No. 32-3, September 2002
    • 1 Septiembre 2002
    ...These involvesituations that are less amenable to rules and codes becausethe criterion of action is ambiguous and often in dispute (Leys, 1943, p. 18). Case-by-case decisions are often already prevalent in these arenas, but officialsmay notbe cognizant of the need to derive legalprinciples ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT