Julius v The Lord Bishop of Oxford and Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtHouse of Lords
Judgment Date23 Mar 1880
Judgment citation (vLex)[1880] UKHL J0323-1

[1880] UKHL J0323-1

House of Lords

Julius
and
The Lord Bishop of Oxford and Another.
1

After hearing Counsel, as well on Thursday the 4th as Monday the 8th, Tuesday the 9th, Thursday the 11th, Monday the 15th, and Tuesday the 16th days of this instant March, upon the Petition and Appeal of Frederic Guilder Julius, of the Hermitage, in the parish of Clewer, in the county of Berks and Diocese of Oxford, Doctor of Medicine, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 30th of May 1879, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioner might have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of the Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of Oxford, and also upon the printed Case of the Reverend Thomas Thelluson Carter, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and due consideration had this day of what was offered on either side in this Cause:

2

It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 30th of May 1879, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby Affirmed, and that the said Petition and Appeal be, and the same is hereby dismissed...

To continue reading

Request your trial
137 cases
  • Jacques Scott & Company Ltd v Moxam
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal
    • 30 November 1998
    ...the first respondent; The second respondent did not appear and was not represented. Cases cited: (1) -Julius v. Oxford (Bishop)ELR(1880), 5 App. Cas. 214; [1874–80] All E.R. Rep. 43, applied. (2) -Sharp v. WakefieldELR, [1891] A.C. 173; sub nom. Sharpe v. Wakefield, [1886–90] All E.R. Rep. ......
  • Auburn Court Ltd v Kingston and Saint Andrew Corporation
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal
    • 31 July 2001
    ...be specified, This was the burden of the submission of Mr. Rudolph Francis for the appellant. He cited Julius v Lord Bishop of Oxford (1880) 5 App. Cas. 214; and the later case of Padfield v. Minister of Agriculture (1998)A.C. 997 is also relevant in this regard. 15Paragraph 2 deals with th......
  • Kenny (t/a Denture Express) v Dental Council
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 25 May 2004
    ...689. Howard v. Commissioners of Public WorksIRDLRM [1994] 1 I.R. 101; [1993] I.L.R.M. 665. Julius v. Lord Bishop of OxfordELR (1880) 5 App. Cas. 214. Kennedy v. Law Society of Ireland (No. 3)IR [2002] 2 I.R. 458. Nestor v. MurphyIR [1976] I.R. 326. O'Keeffe v. An Bord PleanálaDLRM [1992] I.......
  • Brady v Cavan County Council
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 2000
    ...538; (1902) 36 I.L.T.R. 210; 2 N.I.J.R. 89. Hoey v. Minister for JusticeDLRM [1994] 1 I.L.R.M. 334. Julius v. Bishop of OxfordELR (1880) 5 App. Cas. 214. The King (Hewson) v. Wicklow Co. Co.IR [1908] 2 I.R. 101. The King (Westropp) v. Clare Co. Co.DLTRIR [1904] 2 I.R. 569; (1904) 38 I.L.T.R......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT