Kaitey v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2020] EWHC 1861 (Admin)
Year2020
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 cases
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2021-05-20, DA/01472/2013
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 20 May 2021
    ...to step into the shoes of the Secretary of State to say that the appellant must be granted leave and that, relying on Kaitey v SSHD [2020] EWHC 1861, it could not be argued that there is a situation whereby because the appellant cannot be detained he must be granted Mr Goodman submitted tha......
  • Catherine Mary Parris v Olanrewaju Ajayi
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 12 February 2021
    ... ... Physiotherapy cover for Rapkyns Care Home Physiotherapy visit for VG as PL on ... , I sought advice from SHC's HR department regarding the recording of staff during meetings ... These “Notes” state as follows: “Meeting held at ... ...
  • The Queen (on the application of Seth Kaitey) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 December 2021
    ...(CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Mrs Justice Elisabeth Laing [2020] EWHC 1861 (Admin); [2021] QB 285 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Stephanie Harrison QC, Alex Goodman and Matthew Fraser (instructed by Du......
  • Various Airfinance Leasing Companies (listed at Schedule A to the Claim Form) v Saudi Arabian Airlines Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 18 August 2021
    ... ... 77). Further, the “ pleading should state with clarity and precision all the matters relied ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT