Kajala v Noble

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1982
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
34 cases
  • R v Governor of Pentonville Prison, ex parte Osman
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 30 March 1988
    ... ... 308C–E , F–309A , B ) ... Dictum of Ackner L.J. in Kajala v. Noble ( 1982 ) 75 Cr.App.R. 149 , 152, D.C. applied ... (6) That legal professional privilege protected the client from the production ... ...
  • R v Wayte
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 22 March 1982
    ...the same approach to the copy of a video tape of street disturbances which was admitted in evidence by the Brentford Justices. In Kajala v. Noble, reported in The Times, on Saturday 13th March, 1982, Lord Justice Ackner, in giving the judgment of the court, said: "The old rule, that a party......
  • Willard Williamson v R
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 1 May 2015
    ...of comment: Archbold Pleading, Evidence and Practice in Criminal Cases, 43 rd edition, paragraph 8–1. The point was also well made in Kajala v Noble (1982) 75 Cr App R 149 at page 152 that: “…The old rule, that a party must produce the best evidence that the nature of the case will allow, ......
  • Hussey v Twomey
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 21 January 2009
    ...Hebert [1993] 2 SCR 159 approved; Judge v Reape [1968] IR 226 and Malone v Rowan [1984] 3 All ER 402 distinguished; Kajola v Noble (1982) 75 Cr App Rep 149 considered; Vesey v Bus Eireann [2001] 4 IR 192 and Shelley-Morris v Bus Átha Cliath [2003] 1 IR 257 applied; Hay v O'Grady [1992] 2 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 12-4, November 2008
    • 1 November 2008
    ....293Jelisić(Case No.IT-95-10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20Juman vDoucette 2008 SCC8 . . . . . . . . . 234–245Kajala vNoble (1982) 75Cr App R149 . . . . . . . 290Kavanagh v Governor of Mountjoy Prison [2002]2 ILRM81 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220Kavan......
  • Subject Index, Volume 76, 2003
    • United Kingdom
    • Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 76-4, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...65Haggis v DPP (October 2003), QBD 336–340Handyside v UK (1976) EHRR 737 259Jasper v United Kingdom (2000) 30 EHRR 1 249Kajala v Noble (1982) 75 CrAppR 149 335Krohn v Director of Public Prosecutions 18 March 1997, unreported,[1997] COD 345, (1997) Off‌icial Transcript 2982 68Linehan v DPP [......
  • Authenticating ‘Things’ in English Law: Principles for Adducing Tangible Evidence in Common Law Jury Trials
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 12-4, November 2008
    • 1 November 2008
    ...[1990] RTR 208 at 219. Cf. Taylor vChief Constable [1987] 1 AllER 225 at 230.132 RvMaqsud Ali [1966] 1 QB 688 at 700; Kajala vNoble (1982) 75 Cr App R 149 at 150; RvCoulston,unreported, 13 February 1984, CA; RvSmith, unreported, 28 July 2000 at [31]; RvChenia [2002]EWCA Crim 2345; Attorney-......
  • Recent Judicial Decisions
    • United Kingdom
    • Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 76-4, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...rule that excludes evidence of lesser quality,that is wrong. If such a rule exists, it applies only todocuments: see Kajala v Noble (1982) 75 CrAppR 149, perAckner LJ.The court regarded the other propositions as debatable. However,the court did set out what would have been, in its view, the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT