Kaslefsky v Kaslefsky

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1950
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
34 cases
  • Wright v Wright
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 22 February 1960
    ...our view rightly, that there was no evidence of "express purpose" in this case. 28 Lord Justice Bucknill, in ( Kaslefsky v. Kaslefsky 1951 Probate, page 38), referring to this passage, said: "That is a clear statement that brutality to the child would not amount to cruelty to the wife, unle......
  • Gollins v Gollins
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 27 June 1963
    ...Jocelyn Simon, P. and Cairns, J.) made an extensive and valuable analysis of the authorities and held, chiefly on the authority of Kaslefsky v. Kaslefsky [1951] P. 38 and Eastland v. Eastland [1954] P. 403, that the facts proved did not amount to cruelty. Their decision was reversed by th......
  • Gollins v Gollins
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 26 October 1962
    ...(1956) Probate, 344, without recognising that the relevant test in that case was not a test of universal application. The case of Kaslefsky v. Kaslefsky, (1951) Probate, 38, was not apparently cited to them, and they omitted to consider, because they were never invited to consider, whether......
  • Windeatt v Windeatt (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 21 February 1962
    ...health. In saying that, I am I hope accurately paraphrasing what was said by Lord Justice Denning (as he then was) in the case of Kaslefsky v. Kaslefsky, 1951 Probate, 38, an authority to which reference is frequently made, and one which I think I may add my brother Danckwerts and I had oc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • ELUMEZE V. ELUMEZE
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1969 Cases reported in 1969
    • 12 November 2022
    ...1 All E.R.881. 15 4. Squire v. Squire (1948) 2 All E.R. 51. 5. Westall v. Westall (1949) 65 T.L.R. 337. 6. Kaslefsky v. Kaslefsky (1950) 2 All E.R. 398. 7. Preston-Jones v. Preston-Jones (1951) A.C.391. 8. Russel v. Russel (1924) A.C. 687. 20 Sikuade for the Petitioner/Appellant. Bentley fo......
  • Theory of the Polish People's Democracy
    • United States
    • Political Research Quarterly No. 9-4, December 1956
    • 1 December 1956
    ...a 8 Lenin, op. cit., XXII, 296.9 Y. Makarenko, V svobodnoi polshe (Moscow: Izdatelstvo Tsentralnogo Komiteta VLKSM "Molodaya Gvardiya," 1951), pp. 38-52. 10 For summaries of this initial period in English, see R. R. Betts (ed.), Central and East Europe, 1945-1948 (London: Royal Institute of......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT