Kay v Lambeth City Council; Leeds City Council v Price

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeLORD BINGHAM OF CORNHILL,LORD NICHOLLS OF BIRKENHEAD,LORD WALKER OF GESTINGTHORPE,LORD SCOTT OF FOSCOTE,LORD BROWN OF EATON-UNDER-HEYWOOD,LORD HOPE OF CRAIGHEAD,BARONESS HALE OF RICHMOND
Judgment Date08 March 2006
Neutral Citation[2006] UKHL 10
CourtHouse of Lords
Date08 March 2006
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
245 cases
  • Manchester City Council v Pinnock (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening)
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 3 November 2010
    ...26 The three decisions of the House of Lords are Harrow London Borough Council v Qazi [2003] UKHL 43; [2004] 1 AC 983, Kay v Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465, and Doherty v Birmingham City Council [2008] UKHL 57; [2009] 1 AC 367. In each of them the defendants ......
  • Actavis Ltd v Merck & Company Inc. (Costs)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 May 2008
    ...and there was a conflicting later decision of the Strasbourg Court. The House of Lords has considered that situation, holding in Kay v Lambeth BC [2006] 2 AC 465 that it should be dealt with only by an appeal to the House of Lords and not by this court departing from its previous decision. ......
  • Miller (Andrew James) v Associated Newspapers Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 5 February 2016
    ... ... in paragraph 47 of his speech in Kay v Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] 2 AC 465 at page ... ...
  • Jones v Kaney
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 21 January 2010
    ... ... the case of Meadow v The General Medical Council [2006] EWCA (Civ) 1390 , [2007] QB 462 , it ... in the case of Kay and others v Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] UKHL 10 reported ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Construction, Property & Real Estate (Case Law Review, Issue 2 – February 2007)
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 15 March 2007
    ...English precedent v European ruling Kay & Ors v Lambeth London Borough Council & Ors: Price & Ors v Leeds City Council [2006] 2 AC 465 The House of Lords considered, amongst other things, whether the English rules of precedent had to be modified to enable a court not to follow a......
20 books & journal articles
  • A COMMON LAW TORT OF PRIVACY?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...Nicole Moreham, “Privacy and Horizontality: Relegating the Common Law”(2007) 123 LQR 373. This should be compared with Kay v Lambeth LBC[2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465: in the event of a conflict between a decision of the Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights, lower courts mu......
  • The Housing and Planning Act 2016: Rewarding the Aspiration of Homeownership?
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 80-4, July 2017
    • 1 July 2017
    ...in the Supreme Court’(2012) 75 MLR 78.106 For example, Harrow LBC vQazi [2003] UKHL 43; [2004] 1 AC 983; Kay vLambeth LBC;Leeds CC vPrice [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465; Doherty vBirmingham CC [2008] UKHL57; [2009] 1 AC 367.107 For an excellent summary, see S. Nield, ‘Clash of the Titans: ......
  • No Place Like Home: The UK Courts' Cautious Approach on Applying the European Convention on Human Rights to English Housing Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Southampton Student Law Review No. 10-1, January 2020
    • 1 January 2020
    ...50 ibid [50]. 51 Zehenter v Austria App No 20082/02 (ECtHR, 16 July 2009). 52 Nield (n 25) 113. 53 Kay v Lambeth LBC; Leeds CC v Price [2006] UKHL 10, [2006] 2 AC 465. S.S.L.R Vol.10 4:3, but the majority were adamant in their refusal that the personal circumstances of the individual should......
  • Human Rights and the Law of Leases
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh Law Review No. , May 2013
    • 1 May 2013
    ...agreements have formed the basis for several of the most significant human rights decisions handed down by the UK11Kay v Lambeth LBC [2006] UKHL 10, [2006] 2 AC 465; Doherty v Birmingham City Council [2008] UKHL 57, [2009] 1 AC 367; R (on the application of Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housi......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT