Khorasandjian v Bush

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Judgment Date16 February 1993
Date16 February 1993
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
66 cases
  • Allen Needham (Erica) and Fiona Clarke v Charmaine Senior
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court
    • 24 March 2006
    ...in the land where the telephone is located and so has locus standi to bring the action in nuisance. Mr. Miller has cited the case of Khorasandjian v Bush [1993] 3 All ER 669 in support of the proposition that telephone calls can constitute harassment which itself can amount to private nuis......
  • C v Holland
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 24 August 2012
    ... [2003] UKHL 53, [2004] 2 AC 406. 53 Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1979] Ch 344; Kaye v Robertson [1991] FSR 62 (CA); Khorasandjian v Bush [1993] QB 727 (CA); Earl Spencer v United Kingdom (1998) 25 EHRR CD105 (EComHR). 54 Wainwright v Home Office at [7]. 55 At [31]. 56 At [......
  • Mohd Ridzwan Abdul Razak v Asmah Hj Mohd Nor
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Sullivan v Boylan and Others (No 2)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 12 March 2013
    ...35 WILKINSON v DOWNTON 1895-9 AER 267 1897 2 QB 57 NEWARK THE BOUNDARIES OF NUISANCE 1949 65 LQR 480 KHORASANDJIAN v BUSH 1993 3 AER 669 1993 QB 727 1993 3 WLR 476 1993 2 FCR 257 1993 2 FLR 66 HUNTER v CANARY WHARF LTD 1997 2 AER 426 1997 AC 655 1997 2 WLR 684 MCMAHON & BINCHY LAW OF TO......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
  • Tort Litigation in the Context of Intra‐Familial Abuse
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 61-2, March 1998
    • 1 March 1998
    ...injunctive relief in the context of harassment or abuse hasrecently been extended by the Court of Appeal: see Khorasandjian vBush [1993] 3 All ER 669 andBurris vAzadani [1995] 4 All ER 802, discussed in J. Conaghan, ‘Harassment and the Law of Torts:Khorasandjian vBush’ (1993) 1 Feminist Leg......
  • A Potential Framework For Privacy? A Reply To Hello!
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 69-5, September 2006
    • 1 September 2006
    ...later unsuccessfully appealed:[2003] UKHL 53, [2003] 4 All ER 969.33 Speci¢cally,by Kaye vRobertson [1991] FSR 62 and Khorasandjian vBush [1993] QB 727.34 [2003] QB 967,[229].35 Wa i n wr i g h t vHome O⁄c e [2003] UKHL 53, [2003] 4 All ER 969, [35]. All other members of theHouse agreed wit......
  • Far Beyond ‘The Early Morning Crowing of a Farmyard Cock’: Revisiting the Place of Nuisance within Legal and Political Discourse
    • United Kingdom
    • Social & Legal Studies Nbr. 11-1, March 2002
    • 1 March 2002
    ...[1957] 2 All ER 343Kennaway v Thompson [1980] 3 All ER 329Kensington & Chelsea v Simmonds [1996] 29 HLR 507Khorasandjian v Bush [1993] 3 All ER 669Laws v Florinplace Ltd [1981] 1 All ER 659Leakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty [1980] 1 All ER 17 Lippi......
  • A tort of invasion of privacy in Australia?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 29 Nbr. 2, August 2005
    • 1 August 2005
    ...an action for disclosure against the television broadcaster. (257) See also Morgan, above n 115,445. (258) (2001) 208 CLR 199,255. (259) [1993] QB 727 (260) In the United States, similar facts are used to illustrate Second Restatement [section] 652B (1977), based on Housh v Peth, 165 Ohio S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT