Kimber v Admans

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1900
Date1900
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • Goodchild v Romford BC
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Carver
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 July 2003
    ...that is intended for some purpose of habitation. He says that a block of flats is just such a building. He relies on the case of Kinver v Admans, [1900] 1 Chancery, 412, to support that proposition. In that case the defendant had bought two remaining plots of a development and he proposed ......
  • Belton v Nicholl
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 13 December 1941
    ...624. (1) [1936] I. R. 677. (1) [1900] 2 Ch. 388. (2) [1922] 1 K. B. 742. (1) Unreported. (2) 35 T. L. R. 310. (3) [1932] 1 Ch. 362. (4) [1900] 1 Ch. 412. (5) 1 Ex. D. 469. (6) [1900] 2 Ch. 388. (7) [1928] 1 Ch. 517. (1) [1928] 1 Ch. 517. (2) 27 Ch. D. 71. (1) 15 Ch. D. 247. (2) [1932] 1 Ch.......
  • Wong Bei Nei And Another v Attorney General
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 7 December 1973
    ...include a block of flats with a common entrance. What was in dispute however was the meaning of private dwelling house. Kimber v. Admans (1900) 1 Ch.412; Grant v. Langston (1900) A.C.383; Ilford Park Estates v. Jacobs (1903) 2 Ch.522; Barton v. Keeble (1928) Ch.517; Downie v. Turner (1951) ......
  • Get Started for Free