Kirby v Cowderoy

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtPrivy Council
Judgment Date1912
Year1912
Date1912

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
43 cases
  • Harley Corporation Guarantee Investment Company Ltd v Estate Rudolph Daley, Etal Walters and RBTT Bank Jamaica Ltd
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 20 December 2010
    ...has a good title, cannot thereafter set up his title against the purchaser. - see Sharpe v Foy (1868) 4 Ch App. 35; and Kirby v Cowderoy [1912] AC 599 PC. In this case, there is nothing to show that the bank refrained from insisting on its legal rights while the rights are violated by Daley......
  • Brill v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 31 May 2010
    ...(C.A.), refd to. [para. 134]. Scott v. Smith (1979), 36 N.S.R.(2d) 541; 64 A.P.R. 541 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 134]. Kirby v. Cowderoy, [1912] A.C. 599 (P.C.), refd to. [para. 135]. Elliott v. Jardine (1961), 45 M.P.R. 104 (N.S.S.C. in banco), refd to. [para. 135]. Taylor v. Willigar and Ski......
  • Wallis's Cayton Bay Holiday Camp Ltd v Shell-Mex and B.P. Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 July 1974
    ...of a possession". This passage was cited with approval by Lord Macnaghten in Johnson v. O'Neil (1911) A.C. 583 and by Lord Shaw in Kirley v. Cowderov (1912) A.C. 599. 60 In my judgment, when the land in question is being held primarily for its development potential, the most important of th......
  • Mabo v State of Queensland (No2)
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 3 June 1992
    ...App 116 657. Lord Advocate v Lord LovatELR (1880) 5 App Cas 273, at 288; Johnston v O'NeillELR [1911] AC 552, at 583; Kirby v CowderoyELR [1912] AC 599, at 602–3 658. McNeil, pp 196–204 659. See for instance Lands Acquisition Act 1989 (Cth), Pt VII; Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation......
  • Get Started for Free