Kleinwort, Sons & Company v Dunlop Rubber Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 16 July 1907 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1907] UKHL J0716-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 16 July 1907 |
[1907] UKHL J0716-1
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel, as well on Thursday the 13th, as on Monday the 17th, days of June last, upon the Petition and Appeal of Kleinwort, Sons and Company, of 20 Fenchurch Street, in the City of London, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 19th of February 1907, might be reviewed before His Majesty the King in His Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to His Majesty the King in His Court of Parliament might seem meet; as also upon the printed case of the Dunlop Rubber Company, Limited, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and due consideration had this day of what was offered on either side in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in the Court of Parliament of His Majesty the King assembled, That the said Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 19th day of February 1907, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby, Affirmed; and that the said Petition and Appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed this House: And it is further Ordered, That the Appellants do pay, or cause to be paid, to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Marsfield Automotive Inc. v Kamal Siddiqi
...cases (two in the House of Lords and two in the Court of Appeal) were binding authorities in favour of his submission. They were Kleinwort v Dunlop Rubber (1907) 97 LT 263, British American Continental Bank v British Bank for Foreign Trade [1926] 1 KB 328, Gowers v Lloyds and National Provi......
-
Raffles Money Change Pte Ltd (formerly known as Honest Money Changer Pte Ltd) v Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (Publ) (formerly known as Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB)
...from the Appellant unless the Appellant has changed its position to its detriment (Kleinwort, Sons, and Co v Dunlop Rubber Company (1907) 97 LT 263). The Appellant has indeed alleged that it had changed its position by paying the proceeds of the collection to its own customer immediately af......
- Nurdin and Peacock Plc v D B Ramsden and Company Ltd
-
The High Commissioner for Pakistan in the United Kingdom v Prince Mukarram Jah, His Exalted Highness the 8th Nizam of Hyderabad
...J); Continental Caoutchouc and Gutta Percha Co v. Kleinwort, Sons & Co, (1904) 90 LT 474; Kleinwort, Sons & Co v Dunlop Rubber Co, (1907) 97 LT 263; Kerrison v. Glyn, Mills, Currie & Co, (1911) 81 LJKB 465; Transvaal and Delagoa Bay Investment Co Ltd v. Atkinson, [1944] 1 All ER 579; Austr......
-
What is unjust about theft?
...money and the principal is the enr iched party. This exception is relevant to receipt by banks: Kleinwort Sons & Co v Dunlop Rubber Co (1907) 97 LT 263.15 Lipkin Gor man v Karpnale Ltd [1988] UKHL 12, [1991] 2 AC 548 (HL).© Juta and Company (Pty) 352 PRIVATE LAW IN A CHANGING WORLD(a) Ignor......