Knutsford (SS) Ltd v Tillmanns & Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1908 |
| Year | 1908 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
38 cases
- Pertubohan Berita Nasional Malaysia v Stephen Kalong Ningkan
-
Charles Roberts v Kseye Capital No.1 Ltd
...and words such as ‘ any other cause’ or ‘ any other reason’ cannot be limited by the principle: Tillmanns & Co v SS Knutsford Ltd [1908] 2 KB 385; CFH Clearing Ltd v Merrill Lynch International [2019] EWHC 963 (Comm) f) Defining how to determine what will and will not constitute a genus ha......
-
Stag Line Ltd v Foscolo, Mango & Company Ltd
...Mar. Law Cas. 504 115 L. T. Rep. 508 (1916) 2 K. B. 783 Tillmanns and Co. v. Steamship Knutsford LimitedELRDID=ASPM 99 L. T. Rep. 399 (1908) 2 K. B. 385 11 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 105 Baerselman v. BaileyDID=ASPMELR 8 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 4 72 L. T. Rep. 677 (1895) 2 Q. B. 301 Thorman v. Dowgate S......
-
Bulk Ship Union SA (Applicant/Claimant) v Clipper Bulk Shipping Ltd (Respondent/Defendant)
...a clause in his bill of lading and then proceeding to act upon it' (see to the same effect Lord Justice Kennedy in the Court of Appeal [1908] 2/K.B. 385 at pages 406 to 407). Secondly, any error which the master made in this connection was not an error in the navigation or management of the......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
General Principles of Interpretation
...AC 351 (HL) [ Glynn ]. 111 Consolidated Bathurst Export , above note 2 at 59. 112 See, for example, Tillmanns & Co v SS Knutsford Ltd , [1908] 2 KB 385 at 402, Farwell LJ (“there is a presumption that business men do not intend to do anything absurd, which is some slight guide; but in all c......
-
General Principles of Interpretation
...for claims by the insured — otherwise 71 Ibid. at 58. 72 Ibid. at 59. 73 See, for example, Tillmanns & Co . v. S.S. Knutsford Ltd ., [1908] 2 K.B. 385 at 402, Farwell L.J. (“there is a presumption that business men do not intend to do anything absurd, which is some slight guide; but in all ......
-
Contractual Discretion and Administrative Discretion: A Unified Analysis
...Overlook vFoxtel [2002] NSWSC 17, at [67]; Burger King,aboven101,at[187].Foranapparentexception, seeTillmans& Co vSS Knutsford Lt d [1908] 2 KB 385, 406 per Farwell LJ, suggestingthat a ship’s master, in deciding whether ice made a port inaccessible, had toexercise his di scretion‘fairlyas ......