Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
Judgment Date02 Mar 2007
Neutral Citation[2007] UKEAT 0516_06_0203
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • Dr Kevin Beatt v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 May 2017
  • Royal Mail Ltd v Kamaljeet Jhuti
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 October 2017
    ...(where it occurs) in the same way, it is not safe always to read across from one scheme to the other. In Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 380, [2008] ICR 799, which involved a claim of whistleblower dismissal, Mummery LJ said, at para. 48 (p. 809 D–E): "Unfair dismissal and......
  • The Co-Operative Group Ltd v Mr S Baddeley
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 May 2014
    ...an admissible reason for dismissal is on the employer, even in the case of a claim under section 103A: see Küzel v Roche Products Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 380, [2008] ICR 45 I turn to examine the passages in the Reasons which bear on the Tribunal's conclusion that Mr Atkinson and Mr Logue were......
  • Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 April 2008
    ...“whistleblower's” claim under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, as amended (the 1996 Act). The EAT judgment is reported at [2007] ICR 945. 7 Although Dr Kuzel persuaded the EAT that there was an error of law in the ET decision, she appeals to this court because she is dissatis......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT