L v K (Freezing Orders: Principles and Safeguards) [Family Division]

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMr Justice Mostyn
Judgment Date24 June 2013
Neutral Citation[2013] EWHC 1735 (Fam)
Docket NumberCase No: FD13D00606
CourtFamily Division
Date24 June 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
38 cases
  • JC v KH
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 November 2013
    ...approve of the summaries of the same collated by Charles J in B v A (Wasted Costs Order) [2013] 2 FLR 958 and by Mostyn J in UL v BK [2013] EWHC 1735 (Fam). Non compliance with orders can have a very significant effect and it is the duty of the court to prevent one party obtaining unfair ad......
  • Ruanne Dellal v Guy Dellal and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 1 April 2015
    ...issue to be tried" and that the orders for service out were properly made by District Judge Hess. 80 In my decision of L v K (Freezing Orders: Principles and Safeguards) [2014] Fam 35 I sought to analyse all the relevant principles governing the grant of and challenge to an ex parte freezin......
  • C v C and Anor
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 30 September 2015
    ...and (ii) what is the status of the decisions in Roche and Shipman in the light of Mostyn J's observations in L v K (Freezing Orders: Principles and Safeguards) [2013] EWHC 1735 (Fam), [2014] 2 WLR 914 (otherwise reported as UL v BK (Freezing Orders; Safeguards; Standard Examples)) ? This l......
  • Anthony David Kerman v Tatiana Akhmedova
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 February 2018
    ...summons (and possibly the proceedings themselves) would have been defeated.” 31 We were taken to Mostyn J's judgment in L v K (Freezing Orders: Principles and Safeguards) [2013] EWHC 1735 (Fam), [2014] Fam 35, where, at para 35, he quoted what Lord Hoffmann had said in National Commercial ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
  • Freezing Orders Within English Divorce Proceedings
    • Singapore
    • Mondaq Singapore
    • 5 November 2019
    ...of the assets are in the husband's sole name and therefore under his sole control, the wife's position may be vulnerable. UL v BK [2013] EWHC 1735 (Fam) provides guidance on the principles to be applied on an application for a freezing The applicant must show clear evidence of unjustified d......
  • Laying Down The Law On Freezing Orders
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 23 September 2013
    ...UL v BK [2013] EWHC 1735 (Fam), Mostyn J reiterated the mantra that the law to be applied in one court room must be the same as that applied in the next, whether in the High Court or a county court, the Family Division or the This case concerned a freezing injunction which a wife had succes......
  • The Case Of Tobias V Tobias [2017] - Freezing Injunctions, Without Notice Orders And Applications To The Out-Of-Hours Judge
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 12 September 2017
    ...involves a novel and important point of law". Mr Justice Mostyn also reminded practitioners of the guidance in the case of L v K [2014] Fam 35 and the President's Guidance of 18th January 2017 in relation to ex parte (without notice) order applications; with him confirming that "In paragrap......
6 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Inheritance Act Claims 4th ed
    • 14 August 2023
    ...1 FCR 526, FD 102 Udny v Udny (1869) 1 LR Sc & Div 441, 7 Macq 89, HL 20 UL v BK (Freezing Order: Safeguards: Standard Examples) [2013] EWHC 1735 (Fam), [2014] Fam 35, [2014] 2 WLR 914, [2013] Fam Law 1379 300 Upton (Timothy Everard) v National Westminster Bank plc and Others [2004] EWHC 19......
  • Financial Remedies
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill The Single Family Court: a Practitioner's Handbook - 2nd Edition Contents
    • 30 August 2017
    ...Civ 908, [2010] 2 FLR 814. 153 Hildebrand v Hildebrand [1992] 1 FLR 244; UL v BK (Freezing Orders: Safeguards: Standard Examples) [2013] EWHC 1735 (Fam). extent that if you have a confidential document, it must be disclosed, at the latest, when you serve a questionnaire. Hildebrand is no lo......
  • Essential Practice Guidance
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill The Single Family Court: a Practitioner's Handbook - 2nd Edition Contents
    • 30 August 2017
    ...on an application for an ex parte (without notice) freezing or search order: see L v K (Freezing Orders: Principles and Safeguards) [2013] EWHC 1735 (Fam), [2014] Fam 35. Sir James Munby President of the Family Division 18 January 2017 124 The Single Family Court: A Practitioner’s Handbook ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Mareva and Anton Piller preservation orders in Canada Preliminary Sections
    • 24 June 2017
    ...[2009] 0) No 4894 (SCJ) 49,149 126 U&M Mining Zambia v Konkola Copper Mines, [2014] EWHC3250 (Comm) 93-94,114,121,126-27 UL v BK, [2013] EWHC 1735 (Fam) 38, United Mizrahi Bank v Doherty, [1998] 1 WLR 435, [1998] 2 All ER 230 (Ch) 198 United Oilseed Products v North American Car (Canada), [......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT