Labouchere v Dawson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtEquity
Year1865
Date1865

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Trego and Another v Hunt
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 5 December 1895
  • Pearson v Pearson
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • Commissioner of State Revenue v Placer Dome Inc.
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 5 December 2018
    ...[1919] HCA 18. 162 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Murry (1998) 193 CLR 605 at 617 [29]; [1998] HCA 42; Labouchere v Dawson (1872) LR 13 Eq 322 at 325–326; Trego v Hunt [1896] AC 7 at 25. 163 Reid v Moreland Timber Co Pty Ltd (1946) 73 CLR 1 at 11; [1946] HCA 48. 164 (1998) 193 CLR 605 a......
  • GrainCo (Pty) Ltd v Van der Merwe and Others
    • South Africa
    • 11 July 2014
    ...Ltd v Connors [1940] 4 All ER 179 (PC): referred to Cruttwell v Lyle (1810) 17 Vesp 335: referred to Labouchere v Dawson (1871 – 2) 13 Eq 322: Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns & Ammunition Co Ltd [1894] AC 535 (HL) ([1891 – 4] All ER Rep 1): referred to Pearson v Pearson (1884) 27 Ch D 14......
  • Get Started for Free