Ladd v Marshall
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Judge | Lord Justice Denning,Lord Justice Hodson,Lord Justice Parker |
| Judgment Date | 29 November 1954 |
| Neutral Citation | [1954] EWCA Civ 1 |
| Year | 1954 |
| Docket Number | Case No.: |
| Date | 29 November 1954 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
1917 cases
-
Council for the Regulation of Health Care Professionals v General Medical Council, Nursing and Midwifery Council, Truscott and Ruscillo
... ... Where an application is made to the Court to adduce additional evidence pursuant to CPR 52.11 (2) the Court should not apply the principle in Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489 ... The principles in that case have no application to a reference under section 29. The fact that the evidence could ... ...
-
Ashmore v British Coal Corporation
... ... 283 at page 334, in preference to the less rigorous test applied on the admission of fresh evidence in appeals as laid down in Ladd v. Marshall (1954) 1 W.L.R. 1489 at page 1491, namely that it "would probably have an important influence on the result of the case, though it need ... ...
-
Gohil v Gohil
...referable to the admissibility of fresh evidence on appeal, as propounded in the decision of the Court of Appeal in Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489, have any relevance to the determination of a spouse's application to set aside a financial order in divorce proceedings on the ground of a f......
- Brady v Group Lotus Car Cos. Plc
Get Started for Free
4 firm's commentaries
-
Fraud On The Court: When Post-Trial Evidence Vitiates Judgment (Tinkler v Esken Ltd (Formerly Stobart Group Ltd) [2023] EWCA Civ 655)
...Such claims are entirely distinguishable from procedural applications to adduce fresh evidence after judgment, governed by the Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489 principles. In Ladd v Marshall applications, the findings contained in the judgment remain the issues in dispute. When setting asi......
-
Recent Developments In Extradition Appeals
...at first instance. Attempts at late repairs to cases by either side at the appeal stage will not be well received. Footnotes 1. [1954] 1 W.L.R. 1489. Leave to adduce further evidence on appeal will only be granted (1) if it is shown that the evidence could not have been obtained with reason......
-
A Stern Warning From The Supreme Court In England To Spouses Who Hide Their Assets
...of money-laundering offences. H appealed Moylan J's order to set aside, citing lack of jurisdiction and relying on Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489 regarding the admissibility of new evidence on Before the CA, H contended that MoylanJ had no jurisdiction as a high court judge to set aside ......
-
Winding Up A Cayman ELP Post Judgment Admission Of Evidence And Costs
...it. See the Court of Appeal decision in Camulos Partners Offshore Limited v Katherin & Co 2010 (1) CIHL 303. 4 [2000] 1 WLR 230 5 [1954] 1 WLR 1489 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your spe......
23 books & journal articles
-
Litigation
...71 at [31]. 1342 See, eg, CPR rule 52.21(2). 1343 here are limited circumstances in which new evidence may be adduced: Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489; Cofs Harbour Hardwoods (Trading) Pty Ltd v Wall (1989) 6 BCL 215 [NSWCA]; Fletcher Construction Aust Ltd v Varnsdorf Pty Ltd [1998] 3 VR ......
-
Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
...486 at 486–494, paras 15.1–15.23. 25 Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin v Public Prosecutor [2021] 2 SLR 377 at [67]. 26 [2021] 2 SLR 1169. 27 [1954] 1 WLR 1489. 28 Of non-availability, relevance and credibility. 29 Miya Manik v Public Prosecutor [2021] 2 SLR 1169 at [82]. 30 Miya Manik v Public Pros......
-
Intellectual Property Law
...2014 Rev Ed. 126 Yitai (Shanghai) Plastic Co, Ltd v Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Co [2021] SGHC 198 at [26]. 127 [2011] 1 SLR 1287. 128 [1954] 1 WLR 1489. 129 Yitai (Shanghai) Plastic Co, Ltd v Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Co [2021] SGHC 198 at [30]. 130 [1996] RPC 233. 131 Yitai (Shanghai) Pla......
-
Case Note
...of decision merely to challenge the findings of fact made by the trial judge on the evidence before him. 1 Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed. 2 [1954] 1 WLR 1489. These are similar to those stated in R v Parks [1961] 1 WLR 1484: that the court would only exercise its discretion to admit further evidence ......
Get Started for Free
