Latham v Johnson (R) & Nephew

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1913
Date1913
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
109 cases
  • See Toh Siew Kee v Ho Ah Lam Ferrocement (Pte) Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 24 April 2013
    ...882 (1998) (refd) Joseph Kermarec v Compagnie Generale Transatlantique 358 US 625 (1959) (refd) Latham v Richard Johnson & Nephew, Ltd [1913] 1 KB 398 (not folld) Le Lievre v Gould [1893] 1 QB 491 (refd) M'Alister (or Donoghue) (Pauper) v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 (refd) Mohd bin Sapri v Soil......
  • Kajima-Taisei Joint Venture; Yeap Cheng Hock
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1973
  • Dyer v Ilfracombe U D C
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 15 November 1955
    ...the grades of variety from trespassers to invites for payment in Haard v. Dury L Thea, and Lord Justice Hamilton did the same in Latham v. Johnson. It is not easy to decide in the case of a local authority providing a recreation ground whether it licenses or invites. It has a power, but not......
  • Dunster v Abbott
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 13 November 1953
    ...I think that he was a licensee. If he was a licensee, taking words from a Judgment of Lord Justice Hamilton, as he then was, in Latham v Johnson, 1913 I king's Bench, page 411, "The rule as to licensees, too, is that they must take the premises as they find them apart from concealed sources......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Case Note
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...LR 5 QB 501. 23 See, for example, Indermaur v Dames(1866) LR 1 CP 274. 24 See, for example, Latham v R Johnson & Nephew Ltd[1913] 1 KB 398. 25 This is a less common category. See, generally, F R Barker & N D M Parry, “Private Property, Public Access and Occupier's Liability”(1995) 15 Legal ......
  • Revill v. Newbery: a West Indian perspective
    • Caribbean Community
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 7-2, December 1997
    • 1 December 1997
    ...it. The civil law should stay entirely out of the picture and refrain from imposing a duty of 9 Latham v. Richard Jotmsan & Nephew Ltd. [1913] 1 K.B. 398 at 411. care upon an occupier in this situation. Has he not been through enough already? It would be interesting to see how a case of thi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT