Lau Liat Meng v Disciplinary Committee

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date07 June 1967
Docket NumberPrivy Council Appeal No 28 of 1966
Date07 June 1967
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Wong Keng Leong Rayney v Law Society of Singapore
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 5 October 2006
    ...[1955] AC 197 (refd) Lai Swee Lin Linda v Public Service Commission [2000] SGHC 162 (folld) Lau Liat Meng v Disciplinary Committee [1965-1967] SLR (R) 641; [1965-1968] SLR 8 (folld) Law Society of Singapore v Chia Shih Ching James [1983-1984] SLR (R) 596; [1984-1985] SLR 53 (folld) Law Soci......
  • Chan Chow Wang v The Law Society of Singapore
    • Singapore
    • Privy Council
    • 23 May 1978
    ... ... subject of concurrent findings of fact by that court and the disciplinary committee which heard and investigated the matter, Mr Chan was charged ... ...
  • The Law Society of Singapore v Chan Chow Wang
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 22 November 1974
    ... ... This she did by getting the assistance of one Ng Jui Meng, the Assistant Personnel Manager of Bridgestone Singapore Ltd. He was the ... On the same day, ie 27 November, the Secretary of the inquiry committee of the Law Society wrote to Mr Chan sending him a copy of Mdm Seah Huay`s ... Mdm Seah Huay was giving evidence at the hearing before the disciplinary committee which was appointed by the Chief Justice under s 91 of the Legal ... See Lau Liat Meng v Disciplinary Committee [1965-1968] SLR 8 where the Judicial ... ...
  • Harris v Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 July 2010
    ...to be relied on by the tribunal, the appellant ought to have been given notice of them and the opportunity to meet them (cf. Lau Liat Meng v Disciplinary Committee [1968] AC 391, 404D; O'Reilly v Mackman [1983] 2 AC 237, 276B-C). 41 I do not accept that there was any procedural unfairness. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT