Laurent v Sale & Company
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1963 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 cases
-
Trendtex Trading Corporation v Credit Suisse
...11 Two modern cases in which agreements have been held void for champerty are In re Trepca Mines Ltd. [1963] Ch. 199 (C.A.), and Laurent v. Sale & Co. [1963] 1 W.L.R. 829.In re Trepca Mines Ltd. was concerned with an agreement governed by French law which contained provisions remarkably sim......
-
SPV Osus Ltd v HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Ireland) Ltd
...takes three-quarters of the damages, the circumstances may not be such as to warrant the assignment: see Laurent v. Sale & Co. [1963] 1 W.L.R. 829'. If this approach to Laurent v. Sale & Co. is correct, then it would suggest a very significant (if ill-defined) exception to the principle of......
-
Trendtex Trading Corporation v Credit Suisse
...assignment. If the assignee takes three-quarters of the damages, the circumstances may not be such as to warrant the assignment: see Laurent v. Sale & Co. (1963) 1 Weekly Law Reports 829. 66 (vii) ASSIGNMENTS IN THE OASE OF TORTS TO PROPERTY 67 In many cases of loss of or damage to property......
-
Camdex International Ltd v Bank of Zambia
...(assuming no adequate pre-existing commercial interest) it was known or expected that the underlying debt would have to be sued for: see Laurent v Sale [1963] 1 WLR 829 and Trendtex Trading Corporation v Credit Suisse [1982] AC 679 (per Lord Wilberforce at p.695C). Whether the debt is 'disp......
Request a trial to view additional results