Lawrence v The King
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1933 |
| Year | 1933 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
54 cases
-
Wong Hong Toy and Another v Public Prosecutor
...at [67]. Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Menocal [1979] QB 46; (1979) 69 Cr App Rep 148; [1978] 3 All ER 961 (refd) Lawrence v R [1933] AC 699; [1933] All ER Rep 196 (distd) Mah Kah Yew v PP [1968-1970] SLR (R) 851; [1969-1971] SLR 441 (folld) PP v Wong Hong Toy [1985-1986] SLR (R) 12......
-
Minister for Justice v A.P.L.
...General) v. Messitt [1972] 1 I.R. 204 where at p. 210 Kenny J. quoted with approval from the judgment of Lord Atkin in Lawrence v. R [1933] AC 699: 'It is an essential principle of our criminal law that the trial for an indictable offence has to be conducted in the presence of the accused;......
-
Moti v The Queen
...4 All ER 817 at 843. 71 (2009) 235 FLR 320 at 333 [43]. 72 (1999) 200 CLR 485 at 514 [69]; [1999] HCA 65. 73 See Lawrence v The King [1933] AC 699 at 708; Athanassiadis v Government of Greece [1971] AC 282 at 294–296 (n); R v Jones (Robert) (No 2) [1972] 1 WLR 887 at 890–891; [1972] 2 All......
-
Chief Executive Officer of Customs v Labrador Liquor Wholesale Pty Ltd
...this Act.’ 5 Sched 51, Item 4. 6Criminal Law, The General Part, 2nd ed (1961), §286. 7Thomas v The Queen (1960) 102 CLR 584 at 595. 8 [1933] AC 699 at 9 Section 3BB of the Crimes Act, added by the Application of Criminal Code Act, so provides. 10 Inserted by Sched 21 to the Application of C......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...R v. Kanu (1949) 12 W.A.C.A., 488……………………….....................................................258, 510 R v. Lawrence (1933) A.C. 699 and Woolmington’s case (1935) A.C. 462…….............………585 R v. Layole (1935) 12 N.L.R 44 ……………...................................................................
-
Cases referred to in 1956
...v. Phillip 18 N.L.R. 102 18 R. v Jonathan Duru 9 W.A.C.A. 33. 66 R. v Kano and Arisah 20 N.L.R. 32. W.A.C.A. No. 3711 66 R. v Lawrence (1933) A.C. 699. 43 R. v Sunday Ijoma and others 12 W.A.C.A. 220. 66 Rex v Holmes 31 C.A.R. 139. 2 Rex v Peter Aniogo, 9 W.A.C.A. 62. 57 Richardson v. Leask......
-
In the Irish Courts
...ifhe is guilty of violentconductwith intent to make the trial impos-sible it is lawful to continue in his absence: Lawrence v.TheKing(1933, A.C.699).If, however, through illness, including mentalillness, he is incapable of understandingwhatis going on or isotherwise incapable of conducting ......