Lawrence v The King
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1933 |
| Year | 1933 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
67 cases
-
Wong Hong Toy and Another v Public Prosecutor
...at [67]. Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Menocal [1979] QB 46; (1979) 69 Cr App Rep 148; [1978] 3 All ER 961 (refd) Lawrence v R [1933] AC 699; [1933] All ER Rep 196 (distd) Mah Kah Yew v PP [1968-1970] SLR (R) 851; [1969-1971] SLR 441 (folld) PP v Wong Hong Toy [1985-1986] SLR (R) 12......
- Jasani; Rembha Bai and Another
- R v Velayuthan
- Choo Teck Soon v PP
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...R v. Kanu (1949) 12 W.A.C.A., 488……………………….....................................................258, 510 R v. Lawrence (1933) A.C. 699 and Woolmington’s case (1935) A.C. 462…….............………585 R v. Layole (1935) 12 N.L.R 44 ……………...................................................................
-
Cases referred to in 1956
...v. Phillip 18 N.L.R. 102 18 R. v Jonathan Duru 9 W.A.C.A. 33. 66 R. v Kano and Arisah 20 N.L.R. 32. W.A.C.A. No. 3711 66 R. v Lawrence (1933) A.C. 699. 43 R. v Sunday Ijoma and others 12 W.A.C.A. 220. 66 Rex v Holmes 31 C.A.R. 139. 2 Rex v Peter Aniogo, 9 W.A.C.A. 62. 57 Richardson v. Leask......
-
In the Irish Courts
...ifhe is guilty of violentconductwith intent to make the trial impos-sible it is lawful to continue in his absence: Lawrence v.TheKing(1933, A.C.699).If, however, through illness, including mentalillness, he is incapable of understandingwhatis going on or isotherwise incapable of conducting ......
