Leachinsky v Christie

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1945
Date1945
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
51 cases
  • DPP v Wilson
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 27 November 2014
    ... ... In Rooney , which involved the power of search and seizure, O?Hanlon J. cited the decision in Christie v. Leachinsky [1947] A.C. 573 , which remains of high authority to this date, relating to the obligation to inform an accused of the reason for his ... ...
  • Michael O'Sullivan v Law Society of Ireland and Another
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 31 July 2009
    ... ... 'DRISCOLL & ROBERTS v LAW SOCIETY OF IRELAND & SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL UNREP MCKECHNIE 27.7.2007 2007/48/10302 2007 IEHC 352 CHRISTIE & ANOR v LEACHINSKY 1947 AC 573 1947 1 AER 567 O'LAIGHLEIS, IN RE 1960 IR 93 SOLICITORS (AMDT) ACT 1994 S9(1) SOLICITORS ... ...
  • Wills (A.p.) v Bowley (on Appeal from a Divisional Court of the Queen's Bench Division)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 26 May 1982
    ... ... 108 Finally, my Lords, as Mr. Cooke for the appellant aptly reminded us in his printed case, Lord Simonds in Christie v. Leachinsky [1947] A.C. 573 said, in a different context but, as your Lordships may agree, appropriately to any situation in which personal ... ...
  • R (Walumba Lumba and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 23 March 2011
    ...345 Search as one may in the judgments both of the Court of Appeal and of the House of Lords in Christie v Leachinsky (respectively [1946] KB 124 and [1947] AC 573), there is no hint of a suggestion that the false imprisonment which followed upon the unlawful arrest in that case might pro......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Unchecked power: the constitutional regulation of arrest reconsidered.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 48 No. 2, June 2003
    • 1 June 2003
    ...at 307-308. (38) See Samuel v. Payne (1780), 1 Dougl. 359, 99 E.R. 230 (K.B.); Leachinsky v. Christie, [1946] 1 K.B. 124 at 128-29, [1945] 2 All E.R. 395 (C.A.), aff'd [1947] A.C. 573, [1947] 1 All E.R. 567 (H.L.) [Leachinsky]. See also Dedman, supra note 11 at 13, Dickson C.J.C., dissentin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT