Learmont v Young

JurisdictionScotland
Judgment Date01 November 1875
Date01 November 1875
Docket NumberNo. 2.
CourtCourt of Session
Court of Session
Registration Appeal Court. B.

Lord Ormidale, Lord Ardmillan, Lord Craighill.

No. 2.
Learmont
and
Young.

County Franchise—Successive Ownership—Reform Act, 1868, 31 and 32 Vict. c. 48, sec. 13.—

Held that the successive ownership of different premises, and merely civil possession during the requisite period, did not afford a qualification for a vote in a county.

John Learmont, C.E., Edinburgh, was entered on the assessor's list as proprietor of dwelling-house, garden, &c., Girdwood Street, Peebles, and, in succession, of dwelling-house, stable, and coach-house, Tweed Green, Peebles.

Learmont had been proprietor of the subjects in Girdwood Street, Peebles, and in receipt of the rents thereof for several years preceding the 15th June 1875, when he sold them. The rent was £29 per annum, and the feu-duty £3, 15s. 2d. He became proprietor of the subjects in Tweed Green, Peebles, at Whitsunday 1875, and was entitled to the rents of the same, which amounted to £11 per annum, free of any deduction, from that term. He had not been in the actual personal occupation of either of the subjects during any part of the twelve calendar months next previous to 31st July 1875.

Thomas Young objected to Learmont's name being continued on the roll, on the ground that the ownership...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
141 cases
  • Administrator General of Jamaica (Administrator Estate Alvin Augustus Cargill - deceased) v Vivian Plowright and Ferdinand Murphy
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 19 July 2001
    ...opponent for which an award of costs cannot compensate. This principle is reflected in the general discretion to extend time conferred by Ord 3, r 5, a discretion to be exercised in accordance with the requirements of justice in the particular case. It is a principle also reflected in the l......
  • Strachan v The Gleaner Company Ltd et Al
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 6 April 2001
    ...reads: “ Held - When considering an application for an extension of time for complying with procedural requirements, the court had, under Ord 3, r 5, the widest measure of discretion. Accordingly, the absence of a good reason for any delay was not in itself sufficient to justify the court i......
  • Buyuk Camlica Shipping Trading & Industry Company Ltd v Progress Bulk Carriers Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 4 March 2010
    ...a discretion to extend time and can do so wherever in the interests of justice it is appropriate to do so. The power is clearly stated in O. 3, r. 5. It enables the Court to do justice in that way and in appropriate cases the Court will extend the time. But I consider, and I consider it mus......
  • Singh (Joginder) v Duport Harper Foundries Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 3 November 1993
    ...Peter J Edwards & Co., Birmingham B2 5BG) appeared on behalf of the Respondent 1 ( ) 2 Wednesday, 3 November 1993 LORD JUSTICE FARQUHARSON 3 This is an appeal from an order made by His Honour Judge Black, sitting as a High Court Judge on 17 July 1992 when he upheld the decision of Distr......
  • Get Started for Free